Nick:
My write up may eventually get into the requirements
List Tony is going to put together. The definition should
Not preclude the requirements. Ultimately today’s discussion
Will be reflected in the definition but obviously not immediately.
What we need now is feedback from the team (which could
Include ideas from today’s discussion) which Sally will incorporate
Into the next cut of her paper. Nick I want to personally thank you
For your contributions to the success of this effort. I admire you
And all of the others in our team. I am happy to be part of such a
Group.
Phil
Phil Rossomando
Research Director, Technology & Architecture
Unisys Corporation
Unisys Way, B-330
Blue Bell, PA 19424 USA
Philip.rossomando@unisys.com
215-986-3998
FAX 413-0215-2043
-----Original Message-----
From: Nickolas Kavantzas
[mailto:nickolas.kavantzas@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 12:06
PM
To: Rossomando, Philip
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-abstract]
Please review 'AbstractBPELCandidateDefinition'
Is your write-up going to be reflected in Sally's paper?
Also, what about today's discussions. Are these going to be reflected in Sally's paper?
Finally, do you know if her paper is also capturing
the public threads on issues related to AbsBPEL (ie. 99, 107, ...)?
I want to make sure that she has captured a 360 of all that has been said so far on this topic.
"Rossomando, Philip" wrote:
Please review the attached document.
Team. I’ve tried posting this but it didn’t seem to work. This is the first cut at my personal interpretation
Of abstract BPEL.
Oh:
One more item. The models mentioned in my word document could be
Procedural models such as activity or sequence diagrams. As such,
Abstract BPEL can be used to exchange procedural models between
Modeling tools.
Phil