Re: [wsbpel-abstract] Groups - 2004-06-18_Requirements on Abstract BPEL.doc uploaded

[Nickolas Kavantzas <nickolas.kavantzas@oracle.com>]

I thought that these two uses are not valid as myself and Satish agreed on early on this sub-committe. What is the
reasoning of having these here?


BPEL Uses:

To act as the public behaviour contract between two parties.

As a means of describing a business protocol between two, or more, parties (with the constraint that the exchanges described are all with a single party i.e. one party is the focus or ‘hub’).

--
Nick

tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com wrote:

> The document 2004-06-18_Requirements on Abstract BPEL.doc has been submitted by Tony Fletcher (tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com) to the WSBPEL Abstract List document repository.
>
> Document Description:
> A revision of a temporary document that collects together our thoughts on who will use abstract BPEL, what they will use it for and the requirements on the abstract BPEL language specification (as per my work assignment). Incororates the few comments that I have received so far.  Thank you from Tony.
>
> Download Document:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-abstract/download.php/7333/2004-06-18_Requirements%20on%20Abstract%20BPEL.doc
>
> View Document Details:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-abstract/document.php?document_id=7333
>
> PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email application
> may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able to copy and paste
> the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.