OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel-implement message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [wsbpel-implement] Face-to-Face scenarios


Hi all.  

I can bring along a wireless access point if that makes things easier.

John


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Diane Jordan [mailto:drj@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:25 PM
> To: rkhalaf
> Cc: rajesh@iopsis.com; wsbpel-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel-implement] Face-to-Face scenarios
> 
> I will look into getting a router for a local lan - what else would be
> needed?
> 
> Regards, Diane
> IBM  Dynamic e-business Technologies
> drj@us.ibm.com
> (919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> rkhalaf <rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com>
> 11/04/2003 10:33 AM
> 
>         To:     rajesh@iopsis.com
>         cc:     wsbpel-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
>         Subject:        Re: [wsbpel-implement] Face-to-Face scenarios
> 
> 
> Hi Rajesh,
> I've posted the bpel/wsdls, but have not made diagrams. There is a
> readme describing each scenario in detail (i hope there's enough
detail
> in there ;) if not please feel free to ask).  Diagrams would be
helpful
> but I haven't gotten around to that yet.
> 
> About splitting up loan approval, for now the services used could be
on
> other machines. I was thinking those may be implemented as BPELs or as
> something else (Java, etc). I included sample (simple!) Java
> implementations from the BPWS4J samples; we could add BPELs at some
> point to replace those and get another example of BPEL-BPEL
interaction.
> What do you think?
> 
> As for infrastructure, I believe we would bring our own. Diane may be
> able to clarify that further.
> 
> regards,
> rania
> 
> Rajesh Pradhan wrote:
> 
> >Hi Rania,
> >
> >This sounds good to me. The Loan Approval example is our starting
> scenario
> >too:). How do you envision the processes split over multiple engines
?
> >
> >Should we create some diagrams to make sure we are all on the same
page ?
> Do
> >you already have sample BPELs, WSDLs etc ?
> >
> >One of the questions I forgot to ask during the call was about the
> >infrastructure. Do we get our own or will we have a setup at the F2F
?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Rajesh.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: rkhalaf [mailto:rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com]
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:47 AM
> >To:
> >Subject: [wsbpel-implement] Face-to-Face scenarios
> >
> >
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I'd like to start up a discussion of what people would like to try
out
> >at the face-to-face. The idea there is to meet and try out a few BPEL
> >files on different engines to exercise the spec.
> >
> >I would suggest starting with a few BPELs that show different
behavior:
> >correlation with a multi-start example, calling other services and
the
> >use of links such as in  the loan approval example, and  more than
one
> >BPEL interacting, perhaps we can run one on each engine. For this we
> >could start with a chaining echo: one client starts it off, then a
chain
> >of processes do rcv/inv/reply where the invocations kick of an
instance
> >of the same process running on a different engine until finally one
just
> >invokes a process that is the plain echo (rcv/reply).
> >
> >I also propose having an additive scheme to a simple rcv/inv/reply
> >process: creating different versions of it to concentrate on
exercising
> >different areas without getting overloaded with complexity.
> >
> >That's the approach I would take in getting this off the ground.  I'm
> >looking forward to everyone's suggestions/input/discussion.
> >
> >thanks,
> >Rania
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]