[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-implement] The uploaded loan approval example
Hi everyone, I also checked the samples in the spec version 1.1 from May and the draft from November and didn't find ... or a namespace decl for bpws in the root element. -Rania Kristofer Agren wrote: > Bernd, > > > > I was specifically referring to the loan approval example that was > part of the file scenarios12-2.zip that Rania uploaded on December 2nd. > > > > Kristofer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > From: Eckenfels. Bernd [mailto:B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de] > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:16 PM > To: bpel implementation > Subject: RE: [wsbpel-implement] The uploaded loan approval example > > > > Hello, > > > > If the sample does contain the root element with namespace > declarations, it should present the omission of namespaces > declarations with ... or list all required. In case of detached > (functional) samples, it is of course required to be declared. Not > sure if Kristofer was refering to the spec or to the sample files from uc? > > > > Greetings > > Bernd Eckenfels > Chief Architect > -- > SEEBURGER AG - Edisonstr.1 , D-75015 Bretten, Germany > Fax: +49 (0)7252 96-2400 - Phone: +49 (0)7252 96-1256 > mailto:b.eckenfels@seeburger.de - http://www.seeburger.de > <http://www.seeburger.de/> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ron Ten-Hove [mailto:Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM] > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 4:55 PM > To: Ugo Corda > Cc: Kristofer Agren; bpel implementation > Subject: Re: [wsbpel-implement] The uploaded loan approval example > > Ugo Corda wrote: > >Yes, bpws should be defined as: > > > >xmlns:bpws="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/business-process/" <http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/business-process/> > >(see Appendix D - XSD Schemas). > > > >Examples in the spec also define it that way (see for example 16.1.2). > > > >I think the spec uses "bpws" in many places as a shortcut for referring > >to the namespace URI, without mentioning the fact that the "bpws" prefix > >is arbitrary. > > > > Yes, such practice has become commonplace in XML-based specs that > use more than one such namespace. Such specs usually contain a > list of all the prefixes and namespaces used in XML fragments > thoughout the spec, to avoid confusion, or overly length XML > fragments. > > Should we suggest to our editing team that they should include > such a list at the beginning of the WS-BPEL spec? > > -Ron > > >Ugo > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >> >>From: Kristofer Agren [mailto:kagren@pakalert.com] >> >>Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 3:35 PM >> >>To: 'bpel implementation' >> >>Cc: Ugo Corda >> >>Subject: RE: [wsbpel-implement] The uploaded loan approval example >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Another question about the validity of the loan approval >> >>BPEL; the loan approval example makes a number of called to >> >>bpws:getVariableData, but the prefix "bpws" is not mapped to >> >>any namespace. >> >> >> >>I have not found a definite answer to this in the >> >>specification, where it is simply stated that the prefix is >> >>"bpws" is associated with the BPEL namespace (section 9.1), >> >>but it is not mentioned whether this is an assumption that >> >>applies to all BPEL files (without having to do an >> >>xmlns:bpws="...") or just to the examples in the >> >>specification. I would like to think that any namespace >> >>prefix should be properly defined before used, even those >> >>that are used to refer to extension functions? >> >> >> >>Kristofer >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >> >>From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com] >> >>Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 4:33 PM >> >>To: Kristofer Agren; bpel implementation >> >>Subject: RE: [wsbpel-implement] The uploaded loan approval example >> >> >> >>I agree. The Partner Link Type Schema specifies >> >>elementFormDeafult="qualified", so all the local names must >> >>be qualified. The syntax specified in BPEL sec. 7.1 is also >> >>quite clear. >> >> >> >>Ugo >> >> >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>> >>>From: Kristofer Agren [mailto:kagren@pakalert.com] >>> >>>Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 12:50 PM >>> >>>To: 'bpel implementation' >>> >>>Subject: [wsbpel-implement] The uploaded loan approval example >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>There appears to be an error in the loanapproval.wsdl and >>> >>>loanapprovalBound.wsdl files; the <portType> element under >>> >>><plnk:role> is not in the partner link namespace: >>> >>> >>> >>> <plnk:role name="assessor"> >>> >>> <portType name="asns:riskAssessmentPT"/> >>> >>> </plnk:role> >>> >>> >>> >>>Maybe I am missing something, but it should it not be: >>> >>> >>> >>> <plnk:role name="assessor"> >>> >>> <plnk:portType name="asns:riskAssessmentPT"/> >>> >>> </plnk:role> >>> >>> >>> >>>Regards, >>> >>> >>> >>>Kristofer >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]