wsbpel-reqts message

Subject: Issue - 24 - Separate schemas for executable vs abstract BPEL

From: ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com>
To: wsbpel-reqts@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:28:18 +0100

This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list. It is in the current version of the list at wsbpel document 2656, It is hoped to have a fixed url for the ever-changing list.

Issue - 24 - Separate schemas for executable vs abstract BPEL

Origin: Extracted from email Danny van der Rijn, 12 Jun 2003
Date submitted: 12 June 2003
Submitter: Danny van der Rijn, Tibco
Description:
Separate schemas for the executable vs. the abstract forms of BPEL would allow validation by schema, rather than by hand-coded rules based on spec verbiage.

To comment on this issue, please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel-reqts@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 24 - [anything]".

To add a new issue, send email to the wsbpel requirements and issues coordination list, adding a proposed title for the issue to the subject line. See the issues procedures document for further information.