RE: [wsbpel-reqts] How many email lists for issues

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Furniss, Peter [mailto:Peter.Furniss@choreology.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:00 AM
> To: wsbpel-reqts@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [wsbpel-reqts] How many email lists for issues
> 
> 
> Following up the discussion last night, I'm not sure where we ended up
> on how many email lists are involved.
> 
> Functionally, from the issue perspective, there are:
> 	a) where new issue requests are sent
> 	b) where issue procedures are discussed
> 	c) where new issues are announced
> 	d) where detailed discussion of issues occurs
> 	e) main tc list
> 	f) other subgroups
> 
> Some of which are likely the same. It was said that issue discussion was
> liable to occur on any of the list. I believe the concensus for now is:
> 
> a) - a new lists which anyone in the tc can send to but only I and
> alternate editors subscribe to.
> b) wsbpel-reqts
> c) the main list, wsbpel
> d) at the moment, wsbpel 
> 
> and all lists except the new issue list are scoured for Issue - nn -
> subject lines.
> 
> I'd suggest, if we can't get a list with properties a), people are told
> just to send direct to the editor and alternates. We lose the archiving,
> but if I abuse my powers, people will moan, and if I don't it doesn't
> matter.
> 
> If we decide we want to make c) and d) different, I can make the
> announcements go to one list with reply-to set to another.
> 
> 
> Peter
> 
> ------------------------------------------
> Peter Furniss
> Chief Scientist, Choreology Ltd
> 
>    Cohesions 1.0 (TM)
>    Business transaction management software for application coordination
> 
> web: http://www.choreology.com
> email:  peter.furniss@choreology.com
> phone:  +44 20 7670 1679
> direct: +44 20 7670 1783
> mobile: +44 7951 536168
> 13 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2JX
>