wsbpel-reqts message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: Fw: [wsbpel-reqts] Groups - Issues coordination call - agenda addedmodified
- From: Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com>
- To: ygoland@bea.com
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:04:46 -0400
Thanks - what is your sense of how best
to move forward on 107? Do you expect to put a proposal to vote forward
soon?
Regards, Diane
IBM Dynamic e-business Technologies
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123
"Yaron Y. Goland"
<ygoland@bea.com>
04/26/2004 07:01 PM
Please respond to
ygoland |
|
To
| Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
| bpel rqmts <wsbpel-reqts@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Subject
| Re: Fw: [wsbpel-reqts] Groups
- Issues coordination call - agenda added modified |
|
I apologize for not making the call but I had the
meeting set in my
calendar for an hour later than it actually was.
As for 91, 97 & 99, I suspect we should first vote on 107 because if
107
is voted in then 91/97/99 are voted out by default.
Yaron
Diane Jordan wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Monica Martin, Tom Freund and I were on the call today. Notes
on the
> discussion:
>
> - how to handle issues from non-members
> we'd like to be able to accept these - the suggestion was that when
we
> get such issues, we put them in a "pending" state and at
the next TC
> meeting ask if there is any objection to opening them. We might
also
> want to ask for a "sponsor" to submit it formally. We
can cover this at
> the next meeting to make sure everyone is ok with it.
> - agenda for next call:
> proposals to vote on: issue 37, 91, 97, 99, 101
> - Would like to talk about how to tackle the issues related to 91,97
and
> 99 (107, 82 and 109) so we can move forward on these.
> Since Yaron didn't make the call, we weren't able to delve into the
> 91,97, 99 dependency tree. The discussion on 107 at the last
call
> didn't seem to be moving very directly toward a resolution.
> Yaron - any comments?
>
> discussion of issue 34
> We discussed whether it would be appropriate to formulate a proposal
to
> vote at this point and to what extent the alternatives should be
> included in it. Monica will prepare one that focuses on stating
the
> bpel requirements vs calling out the WS-Addressing spec. I asked
that
> the alternative discussion include some thinking on deferring action
on
> this till we are closer to finalizing the spec so that whatever we
> decide to do is based on the most current status.
> Monica mentioned that she may not be able to participate on the call
> next week - she'll let me know by Friday if this should be deferred
to
> the following tc call.
>
> - any updates on action items agreed to in f2f for: 75, 83,
108,11, 103.
> We didn't talk about this but I'd like to go through these action
items
> and ask for status on the TC call next week. Let me know if
you have
> any concerns with this.
>
> - start list of possibilities for handling votes at next f2f (assuming
> we may not have quorum)
> I'm putting together a list of things we might do to avoid the problems
> with voting we had last time and will circulate it first to this group
> and then the full TC before the next f2f. Monica suggested we
specify
> times for people to call in to vote. I suggested that we might
want to
> align those times with the roll call.
>
> I noted that we have been strictly enforcing the rule that if you
miss
> two out of three meetings, you get a warning and if you miss the next
> one you get changed to observer. Since we haven't had trouble
in
> general getting to quorum (only at f2f's) we have not been strictly
> enforcing the part about the chair having discretion to change people
> who have a pattern of consistently missing 2 out of 3, however we
do
> remind people to consider switching to observer if this is the case
and
> many have.
>
> - discuss vote on dates for next f2f. After the last call, I
was told
> that WfMC is meeting in SF on June 21-23 (1pm) thus ovelapping the
plans
> we adopted to hold our meeting June 22 through noon June 24 (tues,
wed,
> thurs).
> I'll mention this at the next tc call and ask if there is interest
in
> reconsidering our vote and moving the dates of our meeting to all
day
> June 23 and 24 and half day June 25 (Wed, thurs and fri).
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]