RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 - Issue 23 Resolution

["Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>]

Thanks.  Are you handing the pen back?

-----Original Message-----
From: Yaron Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 12:16 PM
To: Satish Thatte; 'Kartha, Neelakantan'; 'BPEL Spec Editing Group
(E-mail)'
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 -
Issue 23 Resolution

Done.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:07 PM
> To: Kartha, Neelakantan; BPEL Spec Editing Group (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 -
> Issue 23 Resolution
> 
> 
> I would add "properly configured" in the following way
>  
>  
> The set of structured activities in BPEL4WS is not intended to be the
> minimal required set. There are cases where one activity can replace
> another. For example, the sequence activity, used to 
> structure sequential
> processing, may be emulated by a properly configured  flow 
> with additional links. The purpose in
> providing what are, strictly speaking, redundant activities 
> is to make it
> easier for BPEL programmers to both read and write BPEL 
> programs by making
> available familiar, if functionally redundant, programming constructs.
> 
>  
> 
> The reason is to highlight that in cases where a sequence has 
> additional links coming into it, getting the behavior to be 
> eqwuivalent with a flow can be tricky.
> 
>  
> 
> Satish
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Kartha, Neelakantan [mailto:N_Kartha@stercomm.com]
> Sent: Thu 10/23/2003 12:39 PM
> To: BPEL Spec Editing Group (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 
> 0.6 - Issue 23 Resolution
> 
> 
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
> Kartha
> 
> (BTW, sorry I could not make it yesterday--was traveling on business).
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yaron Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:00 PM
> To: BPEL Spec Editing Group (E-mail)
> Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 
> - Issue 23
> Resolution
> 
> 
> In playing around with Issue 23 I felt it could use a bit of editorial
> cleanup. I used the exact text from the resolution in the 
> exact position
> specified. My only change to the issue's text was the 
> addition of a comma
> and the removal of the last part of the last sentence. These are just
> editorial changes.
> 
> I also added an additional sentence which, while 
> non-normative, I felt would
> make the whole situation a lot clearer.
> 
> The set of structured activities in BPEL4WS is not intended to be the
> minimal required set. There are cases where one activity can replace
> another. For example, the sequence activity, used to 
> structure sequential
> processing, may be emulated by a flow with additional links. 
> The purpose in
> providing what are, strictly speaking, redundant activities 
> is to make it
> easier for BPEL programmers to both read and write BPEL 
> programs by making
> available familiar, if functionally redundant, programming constructs.
> 
>         Any comments before I check this in?
> 
>                 Thanks,
>                                 Yaron
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from 
> the roster of the
> OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/
members/leave_
workgroup.php.

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/members/le
ave_workgroup.php.




To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/members/le
ave_workgroup.php.