[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 - Issue 23 Resolution
I think grouping 2 with 30/choreology issues presumes that 2 is about subprocesses rather than subfunctions. That is still an open issue in the TC, we should be sensitive to that fact. Thanks, Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:55 AM > To: ygoland@bea.com; Francisco Curbera; Liu, Kevin > Cc: Kartha, Neelakantan; BPEL Spec Editing Group (E-mail) > Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 - > Issue 23 Resolution > > > Just finished the short call. > > Decision: We will continue to manually hand off the pen. > Will not try > to rely on any auto merge functionality for concurrent editing. > > Actions: > > 1. Sid will take the pen and work on Issue 32. > 2. Paco will then take the pen and work on 7, 39, 46 > 3. We look to Kevin to follow up on the reopened issue 44 > > There was also some discussion regarding the issues call this morning > and the idea of attacking the group of issues relating to > cross process > coordination (2, 30, the choreology issues, ..). Suggestion is to put > this on the agenda for the TC for next week. > > One more thing I should have mentioned. As editors I think > we are most > responsible for reviewing each other's work and making suggestions for > clarity and completeness. I want to have a review pass done > before the > next Editors' call, assuming all the closed issues get incorporated by > the time of the TC call next week. We can then take the next Editors' > call to discuss feedback. > > Satish > > -----Original Message----- > From: Yaron Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:28 AM > To: 'Francisco Curbera'; Satish Thatte > Cc: 'Kartha, Neelakantan'; 'BPEL Spec Editing Group (E-mail)' > Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 - > Issue 23 Resolution > > As I mentioned in my earlier mail I am traveling every week > for the rest > of > this month. So I can't do much. In fact I'm typing this mail during a > meeting which is why I'm not on today's call. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 6:27 AM > > To: Satish Thatte > > Cc: Kartha, Neelakantan; BPEL Spec Editing Group (E-mail); > > ygoland@bea.com > > Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 - > > Issue 23 Resolution > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Satish, > > > > I can go next, if this ok with Yaron. On the other hand, I > > will not be able > > oto make it to today's editors call because of a conflicting > > call. Please > > let me know what is the final decision. > > > > Paco > > > > > > > > > > > > "Satish Thatte" > > > > > > <satisht@microsof To: > > <ygoland@bea.com>, "Kartha, Neelakantan" > > <N_Kartha@stercomm.com>, "BPEL Spec > > t.com> Editing Group > > \(E-mail\)" <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org> > > > > cc: > > > > > 11/03/2003 01:37 Subject: RE: > > [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 - Issue > > 23 Resolution > > AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yaron and Paco, > > > > Please decide between yourselves who wants to go first now that I am > > done for the moment. > > > > Satish > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Yaron Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com] > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:48 PM > > To: Satish Thatte; 'Kartha, Neelakantan'; 'BPEL Spec Editing Group > > (E-mail)' > > Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 - > > Issue 23 Resolution > > > > Short Answer: Yes > > > > Long Answer: A good question. I have a bunch of edits I need to make > > over the coming week in order to fully explain multi-start > > but it seems > > silly to hold on to the pen. I will make the edits off-line and then > > edit them back in to whatever version exists when I finish. I don't > > expect the sections I'm editing to radically change in the > > next week or > > two so I'm not too worried about the effort needed to do a > > manual merge. > > > > Yaron > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] > > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 1:56 PM > > > To: ygoland@bea.com; Kartha, Neelakantan; BPEL Spec Editing Group > > > (E-mail) > > > Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for > Version 0.6 - > > > Issue 23 Resolution > > > > > > > > > Thanks. Are you handing the pen back? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Yaron Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com] > > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 12:16 PM > > > To: Satish Thatte; 'Kartha, Neelakantan'; 'BPEL Spec Editing Group > > > (E-mail)' > > > Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for > Version 0.6 - > > > Issue 23 Resolution > > > > > > Done. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:07 PM > > > > To: Kartha, Neelakantan; BPEL Spec Editing Group (E-mail) > > > > Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for > > Version 0.6 - > > > > Issue 23 Resolution > > > > > > > > > > > > I would add "properly configured" in the following way > > > > > > > > > > > > The set of structured activities in BPEL4WS is not intended > > > to be the > > > > minimal required set. There are cases where one activity > > can replace > > > > another. For example, the sequence activity, used to > > > > structure sequential > > > > processing, may be emulated by a properly configured flow > > > > with additional links. The purpose in > > > > providing what are, strictly speaking, redundant activities > > > > is to make it > > > > easier for BPEL programmers to both read and write BPEL > > > > programs by making > > > > available familiar, if functionally redundant, programming > > > constructs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The reason is to highlight that in cases where a sequence has > > > > additional links coming into it, getting the behavior to be > > > > eqwuivalent with a flow can be tricky. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Satish > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > From: Kartha, Neelakantan [mailto:N_Kartha@stercomm.com] > > > > Sent: Thu 10/23/2003 12:39 PM > > > > To: BPEL Spec Editing Group (E-mail) > > > > Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version > > > > 0.6 - Issue 23 Resolution > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > > > > > Kartha > > > > > > > > (BTW, sorry I could not make it yesterday--was traveling on > > > business). > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Yaron Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:00 PM > > > > To: BPEL Spec Editing Group (E-mail) > > > > Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 > > > > - Issue 23 > > > > Resolution > > > > > > > > > > > > In playing around with Issue 23 I felt it could use a bit > > > of editorial > > > > cleanup. I used the exact text from the resolution in the > > > > exact position > > > > specified. My only change to the issue's text was the > > > > addition of a comma > > > > and the removal of the last part of the last sentence. > > > These are just > > > > editorial changes. > > > > > > > > I also added an additional sentence which, while > > > > non-normative, I felt would > > > > make the whole situation a lot clearer. > > > > > > > > The set of structured activities in BPEL4WS is not intended > > > to be the > > > > minimal required set. There are cases where one activity > > can replace > > > > another. For example, the sequence activity, used to > > > > structure sequential > > > > processing, may be emulated by a flow with additional links. > > > > The purpose in > > > > providing what are, strictly speaking, redundant activities > > > > is to make it > > > > easier for BPEL programmers to both read and write BPEL > > > > programs by making > > > > available familiar, if functionally redundant, programming > > > constructs. > > > > > > > > Any comments before I check this in? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Yaron > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > > > > the roster of the > > > > OASIS TC), go to > > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/ > > > members/leave_ > > > workgroup.php. > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > > > the roster of > > > the OASIS TC), go to > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/ > > members/le > > ave_workgroup.php. > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > > the roster of > > the OASIS TC), go to > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/ > members/le > ave_workgroup.php. > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > the roster of > the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/ members/le ave_workgroup.php. To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/members/le ave_ workgroup.php . To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/members/leave_ workgroup.php.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]