|
Satish,
(I
thought I'd already replied to this, but there is no record of my having done
so)
Yes,
as you point out, I haven't been able to join in the calls or help carry the
burden, and I don't think I'm going to be able to in the near
future. So I should not be counted as a "member" of the group, in
fairness to the rest of you.
However, I partly joined the list so I could monitor it for issues
discussion. But in fact, I haven't been linking in items on this list (or the
other sublists). So
- do you (as a group) want me to include
links to emails about specific issues sent to this list (it's very easy for me
to do, provided the emails follow the normal subject-line conventions - and you
can deliberately avoid linking with subjects like "About Issue 28 - ...
"
-
is there an "observer" status for these
sublists
I
guess if the answer to the first is no, the second doesn't matter and I can
peruse the archive as and when I feel the need.
Peter
Peter,
I am wondering if you still want
to be an official member of the editors’ group. You have not been able
to participate in the calls and the work so far and I think it would be better
to limit the group to active participants so we all share responsibility for
reviewing everything and more or less equitable share of actual editing
work.
Please let me know how you feel
about this.
Regards,
Satish
|