Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] [Fwd: Re: a follow-up on BPEL XML Schema fileplacement]

[Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com>]

Hi, Satish and Paco,

Satish,  ... just to clarify ...
Do you mean that we would prefer storing those XSD files as Word documents?
Or, do we want to leverage CVS to manage version tracking of XSD text files?
(Based on the phone conversation with Paco, I got the impression of the 
later).

If we use MS Word, then I would like to suggest that editors should save 
the Word document as text file and run it with some XML-Schema tool 
(e.g. I use XMLSpy personally) to verify whether XSD is well-formed and 
validated, before the file is uploaded to CVS.

After retrospection, I should have uploaded the invalid version of XSD 
files into CVS first for tracking purposes and then upload corrected 
version of XSD files later. Sorry for not considering that option first. 
I can redo my checkin that way, if people prefer.


Thanks! :-)



Regards,
Alex Yiu



Satish Thatte wrote:

>Alex,
> 
>We use the "track changes" feature of Word to keep track -- let us stick with that model for future changes.
> 
>Thanks,
>Satish
>
>________________________________
>
>From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com]
>Sent: Thu 3/25/2004 10:13 AM
>To: Alex Yiu
>Cc: Alex Yiu; wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] [Fwd: Re: a follow-up on BPEL XML Schema file placement]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Alex,
>
>Thanks. I did not see the fixes you made (on top the spec's schema) marked
>inside the file. Can I assume they are all of the "typo" kind?
>
>Paco
>
>
>
>                                                                                                                                       
>                      Alex Yiu                                                                                                         
>                      <alex.yiu@oracle.        To:       Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com>                                                
>                      com>                     cc:       wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org                                         
>                                               Subject:  Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] [Fwd: Re: a follow-up on BPEL XML Schema file          
>                      03/24/2004 06:36          placement]                                                                             
>                      PM                                                                                                               
>                                                                                                                                       
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>I re-extracted the schema files from the 1.22 Rev of the word document.
>And, upload to the CVS already.  (bpel*.xsd Rev 1.2)
>
>http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/cvs/wsbpeltc/specifications/SchemaFiles/
>
>
>In case of the scheduled downtime for the website, I attached those 3
>schema files in this email.
>
>When I tried to validate those schema (with XMLSpy), I found a number of
>schema syntax typo / mistakes in bpel_msgprop.xsd and bpel_main.xsd. Please
>take a look into those 2 files and see whether my fix fits the intention of
>the spec.
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Alex Yiu
>
>
>
>Alex Yiu wrote:
>
>      Hi all,
>
>      www-124.ibm.com has been up again.
>
>      As discussed with Paco and other editors before,  I extracted the 3
>      XML Schema files from the word doc (Rev 1.19) and made some typo in
>      the main XSD file and added some very minimal versioning annotation
>      into the 3 schema files. And, I uploaded to the CVS repository:
>
>      http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/cvs/wsbpeltc/specifications/SchemaFiles/
>
>
>      Hopefully, that will serve as our point of truth during our editing
>      cycle.
>
>      Also, I create a subdir for Issue 24 Working Area:
>
>      http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/cvs/wsbpeltc/specifications/SchemaFiles/Issue_24_Working_Area/
>
>
>      It contains two files: (1) XSD file with some basic Issue 24
>      annotation (2) a text file briefly explaining the annotation.
>
>      Please note that is the just beginning of the work for Issue 24.  We
>      (especially Paco and me) still need to put more cycles into it for
>      finishing Issue 24.
>
>      Thanks!
>
>
>
>      Regards,
>      Alex Yiu
>
>  
>

>  
>