[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] [Fwd: Re: a follow-up on BPEL XML Schema fileplacement]
Hi, all. Alex Yiu wrote: > After retrospection, I should have uploaded the invalid version of XSD > files into CVS first for tracking purposes and then upload corrected > version of XSD files later. Sorry for not considering that option > first. I can redo my checkin that way, if people prefer. > I just did the re-checkin those 3 XSD files into CVS. :-) http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/cvs/wsbpeltc/specifications/SchemaFiles/ wsbpel_main.xsd wsbpel_msgprop.xsd wsbpel_plinkType.xsd Rev 1.1 = the version extracted from Rev 1.22 of the word document as-if without any modification Rev 1.2 = the version with the updated namespace URI and some typo-fixes to make the XSD well-formed and valid These URLs show the CVS version-diff. http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/cvs/wsbpeltc/specifications/SchemaFiles/wsbpel_main.xsd.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.1&r2=text&tr2=1.2&f=H http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/cvs/wsbpeltc/specifications/SchemaFiles/wsbpel_msgprop.xsd.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.1&r2=text&tr2=1.2&f=H http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/cvs/wsbpeltc/specifications/SchemaFiles/wsbpel_plinkType.xsd.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.1&r2=text&tr2=1.2&f=H I hope the current check-in arrangement works for everybody this time. :-) If not, please let me know. I would be willing to change again, if people prefer other ways to manage versioning of XSD. (e.g. using Word document). Thanks again! :-) Regards, Alex Yiu Alex Yiu wrote: > > Hi, Satish and Paco, > > Satish, ... just to clarify ... > Do you mean that we would prefer storing those XSD files as Word > documents? > Or, do we want to leverage CVS to manage version tracking of XSD text > files? > (Based on the phone conversation with Paco, I got the impression of > the later). > > If we use MS Word, then I would like to suggest that editors should > save the Word document as text file and run it with some XML-Schema > tool (e.g. I use XMLSpy personally) to verify whether XSD is > well-formed and validated, before the file is uploaded to CVS. > > After retrospection, I should have uploaded the invalid version of XSD > files into CVS first for tracking purposes and then upload corrected > version of XSD files later. Sorry for not considering that option > first. I can redo my checkin that way, if people prefer. > > > Thanks! :-) > > > > Regards, > Alex Yiu > > > > Satish Thatte wrote: > >> Alex, >> >> We use the "track changes" feature of Word to keep track -- let us >> stick with that model for future changes. >> >> Thanks, >> Satish >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com] >> Sent: Thu 3/25/2004 10:13 AM >> To: Alex Yiu >> Cc: Alex Yiu; wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org >> Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] [Fwd: Re: a follow-up on BPEL XML >> Schema file placement] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Alex, >> >> Thanks. I did not see the fixes you made (on top the spec's schema) >> marked >> inside the file. Can I assume they are all of the "typo" kind? >> >> Paco >> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]