Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Some questions for Issue 13 editing

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

Both the original description and the proposed resolution includes From 
as their primary example. So I'm guessing this is just an oversight.

Satish Thatte wrote:
> 
> 
> We do want uniform treatment of queries and expressions.  Looks to me
> like an oversight - Paco what do you think?  If you agree we should fix
> this - this was even mentioned in the original issue description was it
> not?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Yiu [mailto:alex.yiu@oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 4:35 PM
> To: Satish Thatte
> Cc: bpel spec; Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM; Furniss, Peter; Alex Yiu
> Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Some questions for Issue 13 editing
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> It seems to me that changes were applied for Issue 13 by adding:
> <transitionCondition>, <joinCondition>, <query> element.
> 
> However, there was no <expression> element for "from-spec".
> Looking back into the proposed resolution, expression was mentioned in
> the text. However, the enumeration of syntax changes did not list it out
> 
> explicitly.
> 
> Is it intentional?
> Or, just an oversight?
> 
> Changes that we may need to apply to expression, including:
> (a) <from expression="..." /> in Section 9.3 and Section 16
> (b)  "tFrom" schema type in the XML Schema in Appendix D.
> 
> Should we fix it by using editor group judgement?
> Or, we should open up a new issue.
> 
> I discovered this issue, when I was working on Issue 103.
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Reards,
> Alex Yiu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of 
> the OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
> 
>