Re: issue list clean up - issue 84

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

I just sent out the proposal.

Satish Thatte wrote:

> 
> 
> Speaking for 115, my answer is yes.  I will get the proposal out.
> 
>  
> 
> * From: * Diane Jordan [mailto:drj@us. ibm .com]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 04, 2004 2:03 PM
> *To:* Yaron Y. Goland; Satish Thatte
> *Cc:* bpel spec
> *Subject:* issue list clean up - issue 84
> 
>  
> 
> 
> As promised/threatened many times, I'm going through the issue list to 
> see if there are some candidates for action based on the original text.    
> 
> issue 84: Submitter's proposal: The BPEL spec be required to explicit 
> define all static analysis checks that BPEL's semantics depend on in the 
> text of the standard. Add an appendix, much like the existing fault 
> summary appendix, that will provide a single checklist of all static 
> analysis requirements with a brief description of their function.
> 
> Issue 115:  Submitter's proposal: Rewrite appendix C to preserve the 
> relevant content without external dependencies.
> 
> Are these ones where we could ask the TC to vote on the general concept 
> and then ask the spec editing team to come up with the actual text 
> required?
> 
> If so, perhaps you could get proposals to vote out?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Regards, Diane
> IBM  Dynamic e-business Technologies
> drj@us. ibm .com
> (919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile : 919-624-5123
>