[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Summary of today's editors' call
Thanks Alex. Kevin, Are you ready to take the pen? Haven’t
heard from you. Paco, have you had a chance to scan Kevin’s
BP-I fixes? Satish From: Alex Yiu [mailto:alex.yiu@
Hi All,
Issues 37, 75, 94 and 114 were indeed incorporated by Alex on June 30. They should be removed from the list of "not yet incorporated" issues.
Issue 126 is not officially resolved. It should also be removed from that list.
Prasad will incorporate issues 43 and 44. He has the pen.
Alex will then incorporate 34. Prasad will pass him the pen, hopefully by the weekend. T here may be a minor clarification needed on whether the reference-schema attribute is required. We need to put this on the TC call agenda for next week. But Alex will go ahead and make the minor change needed later if the TC decides to make this attribute optional (it is currently required).
Prasad will also scan the BP-I inconsistencies reported by Kevin relative to the resolution of issue 128. Paco, if you can also take a look that would be great.
Assuming everyone agrees with Kevin's list of BP-I fixes, Kevin should incorporate them as the resolution for 128. Kevin, can you take the pen after Alex?
Yaron has agreed to incorporate 84 but we will defer that until he feels ready. Yaron mentioned 9 as a blocking problem -- I just looked at it and I do not believe it is a blocking issue. We have mandated static analysis at various places in the spec in order to apply *syntactic* correctness rules that cannot be conveniently expressed in schema. I see 84 as relating to those cases. Yaron, if you disagree we need to discuss.
I will follow up on resolving the remaining aspects of Issue 10, and will incorporate 1 and 10 after Kevin is done.
Cheers, Satish
________________________________________ From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, To: Prasad Yendluri Cc: bpel spec Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] call today 9:30 PDT
This is the list as Peter sees it. Let us verify what is already done.
Thanks for offering to take three issues. I am wondering if 10 should be deferred until we have thought through the "reentrancy" aspects.
Let us discuss in a few minutes.
________________________________________ From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com] Sent: Wednesday, To: Satish Thatte Cc: bpel spec Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] call today 9:30 PDT
To save some time on the call, I thought I would volunteer to take some of the issues. Looking through the issues, I believe Alex already took care of 37, 75, 94 and 114. Also I guess we already applied 105 sometime back (though we just closed the issue at SFO f2f).
That leaves 1, 10, 34, 43, 44, 84, 126 and 128.
Working top down and leaving issues that are better handled by others, I can do 10,43 and 44.
Thanks, Prasad
------- Original Message -------- Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] call today 9:30 PDT Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 08:26:32 -0700 From: Satish Thatte <satisht@microsoft.com> To: bpel spec <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sorry about being tardy with this. I have been swamped - vacations have evil consequences. We have a lot of issues to incorporate. Once we finish with this we are charged with producing a clean draft. The focus today should be on making a schedule for the resolved issues (list below). I realize that there is unfinished technical resolution business related to Issue 10.
Satish
Issue 1 Permeability of scopes
Issue 10 Serialization of compensation
Issue 34 Dependency on Proprietary Specifications
Issue 37 Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
Issue 43 Setting up Periodic Alarms
Issue 44 portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkType
Issue 75 Locally Scoped partnerLink declarations
Issue 84 Require Static Analysis Description & List
Issue 94 Allow both "compensate" and other activities in compensation or fault handler
Issue 105 XML namespaces used in spec and examples need to be defined
Issue 114 Multiple Correlation Sets
Issue 126 Event Handlers with local partnerLinks & Correlation Sets
Issue 128 WS-I BP Incompatible WSDL Import
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]