Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Summary of today's editors' call
From: "Liu, Kevin" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "'Satish Thatte'" <email@example.com>, Alex Yiu <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Prasad Yendluri <email@example.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:24:04 +0200
for the late reply.
somebody can verify my proposed changes for WS-I BP conformance and the group
approve the changes, I can certainly take the pen to incorporate the changes
into the draft.
will we have call tomorrow?
Best Regards, Kevin
-----Original Message----- From: Satish Thatte
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Wednesday, Jul 21, 2004 03:06
PM To: Alex Yiu; Prasad Yendluri Cc: bpel spec; Francisco
Curbera Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Summary of today's editors'
Are you ready to take
the pen? Haven't heard from you.
Paco, have you had a
chance to scan Kevin's BP-I fixes?
From: Alex Yiu
[mailto:email@example.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 To: Prasad Yendluri Cc: Satish Thatte; bpel spec Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Summary of
today's editors' call
I have checked in changes in both
XSD and word file for Issue 34 changes. As we discussed in the conf call this
morning, it contains only the original Issue 34 semantics (i.e. the attribute is
I am handing the pen off
Regards, Alex YIu
I just checked in the updates for issues
43 and 44. I am handing Pen off.
Alex, I guess you get the
-------- Original Message --------
[wsbpel-spec-edit] Summary of today's editors'
Issues 37, 75, 94 and 114 were indeed incorporated by Alex on June 30.
They should be removed from the list of "not yet incorporated" issues.
Issue 126 is not officially resolved. It should also be removed from that list.
Prasad will incorporate issues 43 and 44. He has the pen.
Alex will then incorporate 34. Prasad will pass him the pen, hopefully by the weekend. T
here may be a minor clarification needed on whether the reference-schema attribute is required.
We need to put this on the TC call agenda for next week. But Alex will go ahead and make the
minor change needed later if the TC decides t!
o make this attribute optional
(it is currently required).
Prasad will also scan the BP-I inconsistencies reported by Kevin relative to the resolution
of issue 128. Paco, if you can also take a look that would be great.
Assuming everyone agrees with Kevin's list of BP-I fixes, Kevin should incorporate them
as the resolution for 128. Kevin, can you take the pen after Alex?
Yaron has agreed to incorporate 84 but we will defer that until he feels ready.
Yaron mentioned 9 as a blocking problem -- I just looked at it and I do not believe it is a blocking issue. We have mandated static analysis at various places in the spec in order to apply *syntactic* correctness rules that cannot be conveniently expressed in schema. I see 84 as relating to those cases. Yaron, if you disagree we need to discuss.
I will follow up on resolving the remaining aspects of Issue 10, and will incorporate 1 and 10