RE: Fw: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Done with changes mentioned in the last editorsconf call

[Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com>]

I think I advocated for accepting all
changes in a previous meeting (one of the f2f's if I recall correctly)
and there were concerns with it - can't remember quite what they were but
it might be something we bring up with the TC before doing.  Maybe
after we review/approve the version at hte f2f?  
Regards, Diane
IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>

09/02/2004 04:57 PM

To	"Prasad Yendluri" <pyendluri@webmethods.com>, "Alex Yiu" <alex.yiu@oracle.com>
cc	Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "bpel spec" <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject	RE: Fw: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Done with changes mentioned in the last editors conf call

If we archive the copy with the changes tracked as
a specific milestone
then we can create a new copy, right?  We can even create a separate
new
clean copy sequence numbers log in the spec if we need to.

-----Original Message-----
From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 1:26 PM
To: Alex Yiu
Cc: Diane Jordan; Satish Thatte; bpel spec
Subject: Re: Fw: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Done with changes mentioned in the
last editors conf call

Hi,

> One side question: when we will use the "Accept Changes"
feature in MS

> Word? Some parts of the spec doc are not that easy to read now because

> we have accumulated enough changes. Particularly in XML content (e.g.
> BPEL sample code).

What I have seen usually done with other such efforts is, the TC members

are given a version with all accepted changes (a clean copy if you 
would) and one with all changes highlighted. I propose that with the 
next pass we consider doing that.

Regards, Prasad