[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today
Wow; this will be a short call :-) Current volunteers Kevin: 145, 155, 171 Prasad: 162, 167 Kartha: 170 I would like to spend a few minutes to revisit 170 just so I am clear on it. Tried to look at WSDL for a few minutes this morning and things were not obvious to me there. Satish -----Original Message----- From: Liu, Kevin [mailto:kevin.liu@sap.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 8:41 AM To: Liu, Kevin; Satish Thatte; bpel spec Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today If no other volunteers, I can also work on 145, and 171. This should take care all the issues in the short list(Since Kartha is already working on 170, and Prasad on 162, 167.) Best Regards, Kevin >-----Original Message----- >From: Liu, Kevin [mailto:kevin.liu@sap.com] >Sent: Tuesday, Jan 11, 2005 08:31 AM >To: Satish Thatte; bpel spec >Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today > > >I can take 155. > >Best Regards, >Kevin > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, Jan 11, 2005 07:54 AM >>To: bpel spec >>Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today >> >> >>Issue 145 Properties on Non-Message Variables 16 Dec 2004 >>Issue 155 complexType Variables 9 Dec 2004 >>Issue 162 Unique Activity Names for Compensate 15 Dec 2004 >>Issue 167 Rethrow semantics clarification 27 Oct 2004 >>Issue 170 How to handle faultcode, faultstring, and faultactor 3 Dec >>2004 >>Issue 171 faultName should be optional for invoke fault >handlers 15 Dec >>2004 >> >>This is the "to be incorporated" list Peter has (leaving out the >>perennial stragglers), and I believe it correctly reflects >the next set >>of changes. Let us discuss how to get them in today. >> >>Satish >> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]