RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today

["Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>]

Kevin has the pen.  Kartha will go after Kevin.  Prasad after Kartha.
And then Alex will have the pen to fix the bugs he discovered before the
F2F.

Thanks everyone.

Satish

-----Original Message-----
From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 9:20 AM
To: Liu, Kevin; bpel spec
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today

Wow; this will be a short call :-)  Current volunteers

Kevin:  145, 155, 171

Prasad: 162, 167

Kartha: 170

I would like to spend a few minutes to revisit 170 just so I am clear on
it.  Tried to look at WSDL for a few minutes this morning and things
were not obvious to me there.

Satish

-----Original Message-----
From: Liu, Kevin [mailto:kevin.liu@sap.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 8:41 AM
To: Liu, Kevin; Satish Thatte; bpel spec
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today

If no other volunteers, I can also work on 145, and 171. This should
take care all the issues in the short list(Since Kartha is already
working on 170, and Prasad on 162, 167.)

Best Regards,
Kevin
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Liu, Kevin [mailto:kevin.liu@sap.com] 
>Sent: Tuesday, Jan 11, 2005 08:31 AM
>To: Satish Thatte; bpel spec
>Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today
>
>
>I can take 155.
>
>Best Regards,
>Kevin
> 
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] 
>>Sent: Tuesday, Jan 11, 2005 07:54 AM
>>To: bpel spec
>>Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today
>>
>>
>>Issue 145 Properties on Non-Message Variables 16 Dec 2004 
>>Issue 155 complexType Variables 9 Dec 2004 
>>Issue 162 Unique Activity Names for Compensate 15 Dec 2004 
>>Issue 167 Rethrow semantics clarification 27 Oct 2004 
>>Issue 170 How to handle faultcode, faultstring, and faultactor 3 Dec
>>2004 
>>Issue 171 faultName should be optional for invoke fault 
>handlers 15 Dec
>>2004
>>
>>This is the "to be incorporated" list Peter has (leaving out the
>>perennial stragglers), and I believe it correctly reflects 
>the next set
>>of changes.  Let us discuss how to get them in today.
>>
>>Satish
>>
>