Re: [Fwd: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Issue 1 and 135 changes]

[Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com>]

Hi all (members of editor groups),

I would like to let you guys that I am fixing a number of typos that I discovered a month ago. (For details, please see the attached email)

And, Just a reminder, in addition to renaming from  "variableAccessSerializable" to "isolated", I am going to change "serializable scopes" to "isolated scopes" in the main spec text as well to make sure those terms are consistent.

Two more questions:

• One more thing: I presume the "enableInstanceCompensation" attribute of <process> should be removed from the XSD also. Right?
• <invoke> can have fault handler. Do we want to add <terminationHandler> to <invoke> also?

Regards,
Alex Yiu



Alex Yiu wrote:

Hi, all,

FYI ... some editorial mistakes are discovered.
Hopefully, I can make those correction changes before Wednesday conf call.
If someone has extra cycle, please feel free to volunteer. :-)

Regards,
Alex Yiu


-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Issue 1 and 135 changes
Date:	Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:32:56 -0800
From:	Satish Thatte <satisht@microsoft.com>
To:	Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com>

Thanks for making these catches.

 

 

---

From: Alex Yiu [mailto:alex.yiu@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 2:05 PM
To: Satish Thatte
Cc: Alex Yiu
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Issue 1 and 135 changes

 

Hi, Satish,

I am browsing the changes you made for Issue 1, 10 and 135.

Few questions:

(a) I noticed that you added the terminationHandler to the process level, not the scope level.
I guess it is not intentional, right? You mean the other way around?

[Satish] Oops it needs the other way around.  Please fix everywhere (doc and XSD).

[I should have caught these problems earlier, when I was synchronizing up the XSD for you.]

(b) Few weeks ago, I also found out that the compensationHandler is still available in the process level. I guess that was a left-out in previous editing changes. Right?

[Satish] Yes indeed.

(c) Should the "variableAccessSerializable" be renamed to "isolated" as a result of Issue 1?
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200406/msg00093.html

[Satish] Yes again!

If you agree with all these are some non-intentional editoral mistakes, I would forward this message to the editing group list.

[Satish] Please do.

Would it be too late to make another round of changes now for Dec F2F?

[Satish] These are important fixes.  We should make them as soon as possible, before the F2F.

Thanks!

Regards,
Alex Yiu