Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

[Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com>]

Hi all,

Just FYI ...
When I grab the pen, I will re-do the following changes, which was lost 
during the SourceForge migration more than a month ago:
------------------------------
Fixing misc typo in the spec:
(a) Moving terminationHandler from process level to scope level
(b) removing compensationHandler from the process level
(c) renaming an attribute of "scope" from "variableAccessSerializable" 
to "isolated"
(d) removing "enableInstanceCompensation" attribute from XSD
------------------------------

Thanks!

Regards,
Alex Yiu


Satish Thatte wrote:

>Dear Editors,
>
>After Paco is done, I suggest the following assignments
>
>Alex:  102, 103, 111.1 (XSD) 
>
>Assaf: 29, 81, 160
>
>Satish: 86, 130, 139, 186
>
>Yaron: 132, 136, 154
>
>Passing the pen in that order.  I believe Alex and Assaf are up and
>running with SourceForge.  Alex needs to finish the XSD work on 111.1
>which Paco has completed in the text.  Yaron and I are not yet up with
>SourceForge, so this lets us procrastinate a bit more.  Putting Yaron
>last to give him time to hit us with the 22 additional issues he is
>working on :-)
>
>Let me know if this is acceptable.
>
>We still have 126, 140 and 163 open for other editors to volunteer for.
>
>Satish
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: Satish Thatte 
>Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 10:09 AM
>To: 'Francisco Curbera'; bpel spec
>Cc: 'ygoland@bea.com'
>Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
>
>Yaron and Paco need to sync up and tell us the status of 93 and 112.
>Paco still has the pen.  More mail on issues will follow.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com] 
>Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 10:10 PM
>To: bpel spec
>Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
>
>I took the job of applying the following issue resolutions: 12.1, 93,
>111.1
>and 112.
>
>- 12.1 had already been applied (in fact I had already done so a month
>ago
>- we need to update the "Resolved issues awaiting editing into spec"
>table).
>
>- 93 has been applied to the spec AND the wsbpel_main.xsd schema. Note
>that
>the last text change for section 13.4 was defined in the resolution
>terms
>of the pre-12.1 text; the post-12.1 text already incorporates an
>equivalent
>change - Yaron, can you please check?
>
>- 111.1 has been applied to the spec, but I agreed to work with Alex on
>the
>schema; I believe Alex will be taking a first pass at updating
>wsbpel_main.xsd once he get the pen.
>
>- 112 - I am a bit unsure about what is the final resolution for this
>one;
>Yaron's resolution was amended (by me and Danny) to use the form
>
><toPart part="ncname" fromVariable="ncname"/>
>
>and to not require a precise ordering of parts; I am not sure if this
>amendments apply as well to the <fromPart...> spec, or the <fromPart...>
>spec was left as in the original proposal. The minutes do not seem to
>say
>anything so I would appreciate everyone's help in reconstructing what
>exactly was decided (Yaron as the sponsor of the resolution probably
>remembers better than me) - then I will dutifully apply it to the spec.
>
>So I am keeping the pen for now, pending some clarification on 112.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Paco
>
>
>  
>