[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
Thanks Peter. Alex, I believe you have the pen to finish 111.1 as well as 102 and 103. ________________________________ From: Furniss, Peter [mailto:Peter.Furniss@choreology.com] Sent: Thu 4/14/2005 9:04 AM To: Satish Thatte; Francisco Curbera; bpel spec Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed Editors, I've just updated the "Resolved issues awaiting editing" table - I've left 111.1 as awaiting, since the schema isn't done yet, but marked 93 as done. Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] > Sent: 12 April 2005 18:21 > To: Francisco Curbera; bpel spec > Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin > Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed > > > Dear Editors, > > After Paco is done, I suggest the following assignments > > Alex: 102, 103, 111.1 (XSD) > > Assaf: 29, 81, 160 > > Satish: 86, 130, 139, 186 > > Yaron: 132, 136, 154 > > Passing the pen in that order. I believe Alex and Assaf are > up and running with SourceForge. Alex needs to finish the > XSD work on 111.1 which Paco has completed in the text. > Yaron and I are not yet up with SourceForge, so this lets us > procrastinate a bit more. Putting Yaron last to give him > time to hit us with the 22 additional issues he is working on :-) > > Let me know if this is acceptable. > > We still have 126, 140 and 163 open for other editors to > volunteer for. > > Satish > > -----Original Message----- > From: Satish Thatte > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 10:09 AM > To: 'Francisco Curbera'; bpel spec > Cc: 'ygoland@bea.com' > Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed > > Yaron and Paco need to sync up and tell us the status of 93 > and 112. Paco still has the pen. More mail on issues will follow. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 10:10 PM > To: bpel spec > Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed > > I took the job of applying the following issue resolutions: > 12.1, 93, 111.1 and 112. > > - 12.1 had already been applied (in fact I had already done > so a month ago > - we need to update the "Resolved issues awaiting editing > into spec" table). > > - 93 has been applied to the spec AND the wsbpel_main.xsd > schema. Note that the last text change for section 13.4 was > defined in the resolution terms of the pre-12.1 text; the > post-12.1 text already incorporates an equivalent change - > Yaron, can you please check? > > - 111.1 has been applied to the spec, but I agreed to work > with Alex on the schema; I believe Alex will be taking a > first pass at updating wsbpel_main.xsd once he get the pen. > > - 112 - I am a bit unsure about what is the final resolution > for this one; Yaron's resolution was amended (by me and > Danny) to use the form > > <toPart part="ncname" fromVariable="ncname"/> > > and to not require a precise ordering of parts; I am not sure > if this amendments apply as well to the <fromPart...> spec, > or the <fromPart...> spec was left as in the original > proposal. The minutes do not seem to say anything so I would > appreciate everyone's help in reconstructing what exactly was > decided (Yaron as the sponsor of the resolution probably > remembers better than me) - then I will dutifully apply it to > the spec. > > So I am keeping the pen for now, pending some clarification on 112. > > Thanks, > > Paco > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]