OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel-spec-edit message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

Hi Paco,

I do not need to get the pen now, if you want to finish 112.
Now I assume the pen is in Paco's hand for now until he finishes 112.


Alex Yiu

Francisco Curbera wrote:
I think I had the pen to apply 112, once I clarify the details with Yaron,
which I will try to do right now.


                      "Satish Thatte"                                                                                                   
                      <satisht@microsof        To:       "Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>, Francisco                     
                      t.com>                    Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "bpel spec" <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>, "Alex    
                                                Yiu" <alex.yiu@oracle.com>                                                              
                      04/14/2005 12:27         cc:       <ygoland@bea.com>, "Assaf Arkin" <arkin@intalio.com>                           
                      PM                       Subject:  RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed                                  

Thanks Peter.  Alex, I believe you have the pen to finish 111.1 as well as
102 and 103.


From: Furniss, Peter [mailto:Peter.Furniss@choreology.com]
Sent: Thu 4/14/2005 9:04 AM
To: Satish Thatte; Francisco Curbera; bpel spec
Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed


I've just updated the "Resolved issues awaiting editing" table - I've
left 111.1 as awaiting, since the schema isn't done yet, but marked 93
as done.


-----Original Message-----
From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com]
Sent: 12 April 2005 18:21
To: Francisco Curbera; bpel spec
Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

Dear Editors,

After Paco is done, I suggest the following assignments

Alex:  102, 103, 111.1 (XSD)

Assaf: 29, 81, 160

Satish: 86, 130, 139, 186

Yaron: 132, 136, 154

Passing the pen in that order.  I believe Alex and Assaf are
up and running with SourceForge.  Alex needs to finish the
XSD work on 111.1 which Paco has completed in the text.
Yaron and I are not yet up with SourceForge, so this lets us
procrastinate a bit more.  Putting Yaron last to give him
time to hit us with the 22 additional issues he is working on :-)

Let me know if this is acceptable.

We still have 126, 140 and 163 open for other editors to
volunteer for.


 -----Original Message-----
From: Satish Thatte
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 10:09 AM
To: 'Francisco Curbera'; bpel spec
Cc: 'ygoland@bea.com'
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

Yaron and Paco need to sync up and tell us the status of 93
and 112. Paco still has the pen.  More mail on issues will follow.

-----Original Message-----
From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 10:10 PM
To: bpel spec
Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

I took the job of applying the following issue resolutions:
12.1, 93, 111.1 and 112.

- 12.1 had already been applied (in fact I had already done
so a month ago
- we need to update the "Resolved issues awaiting editing
into spec" table).

- 93 has been applied to the spec AND the wsbpel_main.xsd
schema. Note that the last text change for section 13.4 was
defined in the resolution terms of the pre-12.1 text; the
post-12.1 text already incorporates an equivalent change -
Yaron, can you please check?

- 111.1 has been applied to the spec, but I agreed to work
with Alex on the schema; I believe Alex will be taking a
first pass at updating wsbpel_main.xsd once he get the pen.

- 112 - I am a bit unsure about what is the final resolution
for this one; Yaron's resolution was amended (by me and
Danny) to use the form

<toPart part="ncname" fromVariable="ncname"/>

and to not require a precise ordering of parts; I am not sure
if this amendments apply as well to the <fromPart...> spec,
or the <fromPart...> spec was left as in the original
proposal. The minutes do not seem to say anything so I would
appreciate everyone's help in reconstructing what exactly was
decided (Yaron as the sponsor of the resolution probably
remembers better than me) - then I will dutifully apply it to
the spec.

So I am keeping the pen for now, pending some clarification on 112.





[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]