Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

[Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>]

I committed the spec and main schema with the changes for issue 112. In the
amended resolution there was no reference to the <reply> activity (which
should also be covered by this resolution) so I added that (in the BNF
syntax in section 6.2 and 11.4, and in the text in 11.4). I also updated
the schema accordingly.

The pen goes to Alex.

Paco



                                                                                                                                        
                      Alex Yiu                                                                                                          
                      <alex.yiu@oracle.        To:       Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS                                             
                      com>                     cc:       Satish Thatte <satisht@microsoft.com>, Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>,        
                                                "Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>, bpel spec                              
                      04/14/2005 05:47          <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>, ygoland@bea.com, Alex Yiu                      
                      PM                        <alex.yiu@oracle.com>                                                                   
                                               Subject:  Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed                                  
                                                                                                                                        





Hi Paco,

I do not need to get the pen now, if you want to finish 112.
Now I assume the pen is in Paco's hand for now until he finishes 112.

Thanks!


Regards,
Alex Yiu


Francisco Curbera wrote:
      I think I had the pen to apply 112, once I clarify the details with
      Yaron,
      which I will try to do right now.

      Paco




                            "Satish Thatte"

                            <satisht@microsof        To:       "Furniss,
      Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>, Francisco
                            t.com>
      Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "bpel spec"
      <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>, "Alex
                                                      Yiu"
      <alex.yiu@oracle.com>

                            04/14/2005 12:27         cc:
      <ygoland@bea.com>, "Assaf Arkin" <arkin@intalio.com>

                            PM                       Subject:  RE:
      [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed






      Thanks Peter.  Alex, I believe you have the pen to finish 111.1 as
      well as
      102 and 103.

      ________________________________

      From: Furniss, Peter [mailto:Peter.Furniss@choreology.com]
      Sent: Thu 4/14/2005 9:04 AM
      To: Satish Thatte; Francisco Curbera; bpel spec
      Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin
      Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed



      Editors,

      I've just updated the "Resolved issues awaiting editing" table - I've
      left 111.1 as awaiting, since the schema isn't done yet, but marked
      93
      as done.

      Peter


            -----Original Message-----
            From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com]
            Sent: 12 April 2005 18:21
            To: Francisco Curbera; bpel spec
            Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin
            Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed


            Dear Editors,

            After Paco is done, I suggest the following assignments

            Alex:  102, 103, 111.1 (XSD)

            Assaf: 29, 81, 160

            Satish: 86, 130, 139, 186

            Yaron: 132, 136, 154

            Passing the pen in that order.  I believe Alex and Assaf are
            up and running with SourceForge.  Alex needs to finish the
            XSD work on 111.1 which Paco has completed in the text.
            Yaron and I are not yet up with SourceForge, so this lets us
            procrastinate a bit more.  Putting Yaron last to give him
            time to hit us with the 22 additional issues he is working on
            :-)

            Let me know if this is acceptable.

            We still have 126, 140 and 163 open for other editors to
            volunteer for.

            Satish

             -----Original Message-----
            From: Satish Thatte
            Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 10:09 AM
            To: 'Francisco Curbera'; bpel spec
            Cc: 'ygoland@bea.com'
            Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

            Yaron and Paco need to sync up and tell us the status of 93
            and 112. Paco still has the pen.  More mail on issues will
            follow.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com]
            Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 10:10 PM
            To: bpel spec
            Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

            I took the job of applying the following issue resolutions:
            12.1, 93, 111.1 and 112.

            - 12.1 had already been applied (in fact I had already done
            so a month ago
            - we need to update the "Resolved issues awaiting editing
            into spec" table).

            - 93 has been applied to the spec AND the wsbpel_main.xsd
            schema. Note that the last text change for section 13.4 was
            defined in the resolution terms of the pre-12.1 text; the
            post-12.1 text already incorporates an equivalent change -
            Yaron, can you please check?

            - 111.1 has been applied to the spec, but I agreed to work
            with Alex on the schema; I believe Alex will be taking a
            first pass at updating wsbpel_main.xsd once he get the pen.

            - 112 - I am a bit unsure about what is the final resolution
            for this one; Yaron's resolution was amended (by me and
            Danny) to use the form

            <toPart part="ncname" fromVariable="ncname"/>

            and to not require a precise ordering of parts; I am not sure
            if this amendments apply as well to the <fromPart...> spec,
            or the <fromPart...> spec was left as in the original
            proposal. The minutes do not seem to say anything so I would
            appreciate everyone's help in reconstructing what exactly was
            decided (Yaron as the sponsor of the resolution probably
            remembers better than me) - then I will dutifully apply it to
            the spec.

            So I am keeping the pen for now, pending some clarification on
            112.

            Thanks,

            Paco