OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel-spec-edit message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

I committed the spec and main schema with the changes for issue 112. In the
amended resolution there was no reference to the <reply> activity (which
should also be covered by this resolution) so I added that (in the BNF
syntax in section 6.2 and 11.4, and in the text in 11.4). I also updated
the schema accordingly.

The pen goes to Alex.


                      Alex Yiu                                                                                                          
                      <alex.yiu@oracle.        To:       Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS                                             
                      com>                     cc:       Satish Thatte <satisht@microsoft.com>, Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>,        
                                                "Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>, bpel spec                              
                      04/14/2005 05:47          <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>, ygoland@bea.com, Alex Yiu                      
                      PM                        <alex.yiu@oracle.com>                                                                   
                                               Subject:  Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed                                  

Hi Paco,

I do not need to get the pen now, if you want to finish 112.
Now I assume the pen is in Paco's hand for now until he finishes 112.


Alex Yiu

Francisco Curbera wrote:
      I think I had the pen to apply 112, once I clarify the details with
      which I will try to do right now.


                            "Satish Thatte"

                            <satisht@microsof        To:       "Furniss,
      Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>, Francisco
      Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "bpel spec"
      <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>, "Alex

                            04/14/2005 12:27         cc:
      <ygoland@bea.com>, "Assaf Arkin" <arkin@intalio.com>

                            PM                       Subject:  RE:
      [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

      Thanks Peter.  Alex, I believe you have the pen to finish 111.1 as
      well as
      102 and 103.


      From: Furniss, Peter [mailto:Peter.Furniss@choreology.com]
      Sent: Thu 4/14/2005 9:04 AM
      To: Satish Thatte; Francisco Curbera; bpel spec
      Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin
      Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed


      I've just updated the "Resolved issues awaiting editing" table - I've
      left 111.1 as awaiting, since the schema isn't done yet, but marked
      as done.


            -----Original Message-----
            From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com]
            Sent: 12 April 2005 18:21
            To: Francisco Curbera; bpel spec
            Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin
            Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

            Dear Editors,

            After Paco is done, I suggest the following assignments

            Alex:  102, 103, 111.1 (XSD)

            Assaf: 29, 81, 160

            Satish: 86, 130, 139, 186

            Yaron: 132, 136, 154

            Passing the pen in that order.  I believe Alex and Assaf are
            up and running with SourceForge.  Alex needs to finish the
            XSD work on 111.1 which Paco has completed in the text.
            Yaron and I are not yet up with SourceForge, so this lets us
            procrastinate a bit more.  Putting Yaron last to give him
            time to hit us with the 22 additional issues he is working on

            Let me know if this is acceptable.

            We still have 126, 140 and 163 open for other editors to
            volunteer for.


             -----Original Message-----
            From: Satish Thatte
            Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 10:09 AM
            To: 'Francisco Curbera'; bpel spec
            Cc: 'ygoland@bea.com'
            Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

            Yaron and Paco need to sync up and tell us the status of 93
            and 112. Paco still has the pen.  More mail on issues will

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com]
            Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 10:10 PM
            To: bpel spec
            Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

            I took the job of applying the following issue resolutions:
            12.1, 93, 111.1 and 112.

            - 12.1 had already been applied (in fact I had already done
            so a month ago
            - we need to update the "Resolved issues awaiting editing
            into spec" table).

            - 93 has been applied to the spec AND the wsbpel_main.xsd
            schema. Note that the last text change for section 13.4 was
            defined in the resolution terms of the pre-12.1 text; the
            post-12.1 text already incorporates an equivalent change -
            Yaron, can you please check?

            - 111.1 has been applied to the spec, but I agreed to work
            with Alex on the schema; I believe Alex will be taking a
            first pass at updating wsbpel_main.xsd once he get the pen.

            - 112 - I am a bit unsure about what is the final resolution
            for this one; Yaron's resolution was amended (by me and
            Danny) to use the form

            <toPart part="ncname" fromVariable="ncname"/>

            and to not require a precise ordering of parts; I am not sure
            if this amendments apply as well to the <fromPart...> spec,
            or the <fromPart...> spec was left as in the original
            proposal. The minutes do not seem to say anything so I would
            appreciate everyone's help in reconstructing what exactly was
            decided (Yaron as the sponsor of the resolution probably
            remembers better than me) - then I will dutifully apply it to
            the spec.

            So I am keeping the pen for now, pending some clarification on



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]