[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
I committed the spec and main schema with the changes for issue 112. In the amended resolution there was no reference to the <reply> activity (which should also be covered by this resolution) so I added that (in the BNF syntax in section 6.2 and 11.4, and in the text in 11.4). I also updated the schema accordingly. The pen goes to Alex. Paco Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle. To: Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS com> cc: Satish Thatte <satisht@microsoft.com>, Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>, "Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>, bpel spec 04/14/2005 05:47 <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>, ygoland@bea.com, Alex Yiu PM <alex.yiu@oracle.com> Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed Hi Paco, I do not need to get the pen now, if you want to finish 112. Now I assume the pen is in Paco's hand for now until he finishes 112. Thanks! Regards, Alex Yiu Francisco Curbera wrote: I think I had the pen to apply 112, once I clarify the details with Yaron, which I will try to do right now. Paco "Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsof To: "Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>, Francisco t.com> Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "bpel spec" <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>, "Alex Yiu" <alex.yiu@oracle.com> 04/14/2005 12:27 cc: <ygoland@bea.com>, "Assaf Arkin" <arkin@intalio.com> PM Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed Thanks Peter. Alex, I believe you have the pen to finish 111.1 as well as 102 and 103. ________________________________ From: Furniss, Peter [mailto:Peter.Furniss@choreology.com] Sent: Thu 4/14/2005 9:04 AM To: Satish Thatte; Francisco Curbera; bpel spec Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed Editors, I've just updated the "Resolved issues awaiting editing" table - I've left 111.1 as awaiting, since the schema isn't done yet, but marked 93 as done. Peter -----Original Message----- From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] Sent: 12 April 2005 18:21 To: Francisco Curbera; bpel spec Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed Dear Editors, After Paco is done, I suggest the following assignments Alex: 102, 103, 111.1 (XSD) Assaf: 29, 81, 160 Satish: 86, 130, 139, 186 Yaron: 132, 136, 154 Passing the pen in that order. I believe Alex and Assaf are up and running with SourceForge. Alex needs to finish the XSD work on 111.1 which Paco has completed in the text. Yaron and I are not yet up with SourceForge, so this lets us procrastinate a bit more. Putting Yaron last to give him time to hit us with the 22 additional issues he is working on :-) Let me know if this is acceptable. We still have 126, 140 and 163 open for other editors to volunteer for. Satish -----Original Message----- From: Satish Thatte Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 10:09 AM To: 'Francisco Curbera'; bpel spec Cc: 'ygoland@bea.com' Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed Yaron and Paco need to sync up and tell us the status of 93 and 112. Paco still has the pen. More mail on issues will follow. -----Original Message----- From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com] Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 10:10 PM To: bpel spec Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed I took the job of applying the following issue resolutions: 12.1, 93, 111.1 and 112. - 12.1 had already been applied (in fact I had already done so a month ago - we need to update the "Resolved issues awaiting editing into spec" table). - 93 has been applied to the spec AND the wsbpel_main.xsd schema. Note that the last text change for section 13.4 was defined in the resolution terms of the pre-12.1 text; the post-12.1 text already incorporates an equivalent change - Yaron, can you please check? - 111.1 has been applied to the spec, but I agreed to work with Alex on the schema; I believe Alex will be taking a first pass at updating wsbpel_main.xsd once he get the pen. - 112 - I am a bit unsure about what is the final resolution for this one; Yaron's resolution was amended (by me and Danny) to use the form <toPart part="ncname" fromVariable="ncname"/> and to not require a precise ordering of parts; I am not sure if this amendments apply as well to the <fromPart...> spec, or the <fromPart...> spec was left as in the original proposal. The minutes do not seem to say anything so I would appreciate everyone's help in reconstructing what exactly was decided (Yaron as the sponsor of the resolution probably remembers better than me) - then I will dutifully apply it to the spec. So I am keeping the pen for now, pending some clarification on 112. Thanks, Paco
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]