OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel-spec-edit message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed



Paco, thanks!
And, I will first re-apply the changes lost in the CVS migration 
(related to what Danny raised in Issue 205).

Regards,
Alex Yiu


Francisco Curbera wrote:

>I committed the spec and main schema with the changes for issue 112. In the
>amended resolution there was no reference to the <reply> activity (which
>should also be covered by this resolution) so I added that (in the BNF
>syntax in section 6.2 and 11.4, and in the text in 11.4). I also updated
>the schema accordingly.
>
>The pen goes to Alex.
>
>Paco
>
>
>
>                                                                                                                                        
>                      Alex Yiu                                                                                                          
>                      <alex.yiu@oracle.        To:       Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS                                             
>                      com>                     cc:       Satish Thatte <satisht@microsoft.com>, Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>,        
>                                                "Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>, bpel spec                              
>                      04/14/2005 05:47          <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>, ygoland@bea.com, Alex Yiu                      
>                      PM                        <alex.yiu@oracle.com>                                                                   
>                                               Subject:  Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed                                  
>                                                                                                                                        
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi Paco,
>
>I do not need to get the pen now, if you want to finish 112.
>Now I assume the pen is in Paco's hand for now until he finishes 112.
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>Regards,
>Alex Yiu
>
>
>Francisco Curbera wrote:
>      I think I had the pen to apply 112, once I clarify the details with
>      Yaron,
>      which I will try to do right now.
>
>      Paco
>
>
>
>
>                            "Satish Thatte"
>
>                            <satisht@microsof        To:       "Furniss,
>      Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>, Francisco
>                            t.com>
>      Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "bpel spec"
>      <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>, "Alex
>                                                      Yiu"
>      <alex.yiu@oracle.com>
>
>                            04/14/2005 12:27         cc:
>      <ygoland@bea.com>, "Assaf Arkin" <arkin@intalio.com>
>
>                            PM                       Subject:  RE:
>      [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
>
>
>
>
>
>
>      Thanks Peter.  Alex, I believe you have the pen to finish 111.1 as
>      well as
>      102 and 103.
>
>      ________________________________
>
>      From: Furniss, Peter [mailto:Peter.Furniss@choreology.com]
>      Sent: Thu 4/14/2005 9:04 AM
>      To: Satish Thatte; Francisco Curbera; bpel spec
>      Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin
>      Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
>
>
>
>      Editors,
>
>      I've just updated the "Resolved issues awaiting editing" table - I've
>      left 111.1 as awaiting, since the schema isn't done yet, but marked
>      93
>      as done.
>
>      Peter
>
>
>            -----Original Message-----
>            From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com]
>            Sent: 12 April 2005 18:21
>            To: Francisco Curbera; bpel spec
>            Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin
>            Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
>
>
>            Dear Editors,
>
>            After Paco is done, I suggest the following assignments
>
>            Alex:  102, 103, 111.1 (XSD)
>
>            Assaf: 29, 81, 160
>
>            Satish: 86, 130, 139, 186
>
>            Yaron: 132, 136, 154
>
>            Passing the pen in that order.  I believe Alex and Assaf are
>            up and running with SourceForge.  Alex needs to finish the
>            XSD work on 111.1 which Paco has completed in the text.
>            Yaron and I are not yet up with SourceForge, so this lets us
>            procrastinate a bit more.  Putting Yaron last to give him
>            time to hit us with the 22 additional issues he is working on
>            :-)
>
>            Let me know if this is acceptable.
>
>            We still have 126, 140 and 163 open for other editors to
>            volunteer for.
>
>            Satish
>
>             -----Original Message-----
>            From: Satish Thatte
>            Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 10:09 AM
>            To: 'Francisco Curbera'; bpel spec
>            Cc: 'ygoland@bea.com'
>            Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
>
>            Yaron and Paco need to sync up and tell us the status of 93
>            and 112. Paco still has the pen.  More mail on issues will
>            follow.
>
>            -----Original Message-----
>            From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com]
>            Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 10:10 PM
>            To: bpel spec
>            Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
>
>            I took the job of applying the following issue resolutions:
>            12.1, 93, 111.1 and 112.
>
>            - 12.1 had already been applied (in fact I had already done
>            so a month ago
>            - we need to update the "Resolved issues awaiting editing
>            into spec" table).
>
>            - 93 has been applied to the spec AND the wsbpel_main.xsd
>            schema. Note that the last text change for section 13.4 was
>            defined in the resolution terms of the pre-12.1 text; the
>            post-12.1 text already incorporates an equivalent change -
>            Yaron, can you please check?
>
>            - 111.1 has been applied to the spec, but I agreed to work
>            with Alex on the schema; I believe Alex will be taking a
>            first pass at updating wsbpel_main.xsd once he get the pen.
>
>            - 112 - I am a bit unsure about what is the final resolution
>            for this one; Yaron's resolution was amended (by me and
>            Danny) to use the form
>
>            <toPart part="ncname" fromVariable="ncname"/>
>
>            and to not require a precise ordering of parts; I am not sure
>            if this amendments apply as well to the <fromPart...> spec,
>            or the <fromPart...> spec was left as in the original
>            proposal. The minutes do not seem to say anything so I would
>            appreciate everyone's help in reconstructing what exactly was
>            decided (Yaron as the sponsor of the resolution probably
>            remembers better than me) - then I will dutifully apply it to
>            the spec.
>
>            So I am keeping the pen for now, pending some clarification on
>            112.
>
>            Thanks,
>
>            Paco
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]