RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit]Issue 82

[Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>]

Hi Vinky,

It seems that you assigned 82 to yourself, showing very commendable
commitment to get the editorial process moving; and nobody seems to have
complained at the time of your mail (10/13)!

However, the way we've worked until now, we discuss the issues before
moving ahead, agreeing on whether they are ready to be incorporated in the
spec (82 is not) and agreeing also on the people that should take over the
job; typically, parties directly involved in the closing proposal and
discussions are preferred candidates because of their understanding of the
problem.

I think we need to discuss this in tomorrow's call.

Paco



                                                                                                                                        
                      "Mehta, Vinkesh                                                                                                   
                      \(US - Austin\)"         To:       Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS                                                 
                      <vmehta@DELOITTE.        cc:       <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>                                        
                      com>                     Subject:  RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit]Issue 82                                                 
                                                                                                                                        
                      10/24/2005 01:12                                                                                                  
                      PM                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                        




Thanks Diane.

I have checked in changes for 82.
  - I have left editor notes/paceholder in for inserting (82.1, 82.2, 82.3
and 107).
  - Also I have included the latest email input from Ivana regarding
'createInstance' activity.
  - And, I am leaving my diagram out

I would appreciate if others can review the edits.

I will now look at 107.

regards,
-Vinky

From: Diane Jordan [mailto:drj@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 10:27 AM
To: Mehta, Vinkesh (US - Austin)
Cc: wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit]Issue 82


Hi Vinky,
Generally, the editors take only minor liberties with the wording approved
by the TC.  Even in cases where the editors have uncovered errors in the
resolution we've gone back to the TC for approval on the corrections unless
they have been trivial.  Since the 82 wording had extensive work done among
a group of several members during the voting, I'd suggest we stick with it
as approved.
Thanks for your help on the editing group.
Regards, Diane
IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709


                                                                           
 "Mehta, Vinkesh \(US - Austin\)"                                          
 <vmehta@DELOITTE.com>                                                     
                                                                           
                                                                        To 
 10/21/2005 02:25 PM                                <wsbpel-spec-edit@list 
                                                    s.oasis-open.org>      
                                                                        cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
                                                    [wsbpel-spec-edit]Issu 
                                                    e 82                   
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           





Hi,

As part of issue 82, I would like to add the attached diagram in Chapter
15 to clarify relationships between abstract process (common base,
profile,..) and executable process.

Are the editors allowed to add diagrams for clarifications?

Any feedback on diagram is welcome.

Also, since issue 107 is closely linked with issue 82. I am also
planning to add issue 107 edits.

regards,
-Vinky


Vinkesh O. Mehta
Manager
Deloitte Consulting LLP
Mobile: + 1 512 750 2006
vmehta@deloitte.com
www.deloitte.com

400 West 15th Street, Suite 1700
Austin, TX 78701-1648
USA


This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.


Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of
any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. [v.E.1]