RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] notes from Oct 25 call

Thanks Alex, I will contact you if I have questions.

regards,

-Vinky

From: Alex Yiu [mailto:alex.yiu@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 4:01 PM
To: Diane Jordan
Cc: wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org; Alex Yiu
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] notes from Oct 25 call

Hi all,

Just 
want to remind people that I sign up for Issue 6.2 as well.

*** Paco and 
Vinky,
Another reminder: the part (b) and (c) of Issue 125 are actual 
amendments applicable to issue 157. I guess it may be better for Vinkey to apply 
those two parts. 

Vinky, if the resolutions of Issue 157 and parts of 125 
are not clear to you, please let me know. I will be more than happy to answer 
questions. :-) 

Thanks!


Regards,
Alex 
Yiu



Diane Jordan wrote: 

Attendees:  Vinky, Alex, 
  Assaf, Paco 
I will review recent email 
  and get Peter info on those issues that have been added to the spec already 
  (92.x and possibly others). 
Following 
  is the list of assignments in order:   
  Paco will do 88, 174, 125, 219. 
     Target completion by Mon. 
    
Vinky will do 157, 222, 224, 225. 
     Target completion by next Fri. 
    
Assaf will complete 209, 214. 
    Target completion by next call. 
As usual we'll use email to notify the next person in the queue that 
  the pen is free.   
Alex will 
  start work on a resolution to 82.1 to help get conclusion on the abstract 
  related issues.   
We discussed 
  prognosis for completion of the spec and the likely need for a "corrective 
  editing cycle" to address consistency and readability once all the issue 
  resolutions are incorporated into the spec.  After all outstanding issues 
  are resolved, we should probably plan for 4-8 weeks to incorporate them into 
  the spec, get approval of the updated spec as the latest committee draft with 
  all normative changes and then start the corrective editing.  Given our 
  current status, this could happen in the Mar-April timeframe.  Some ideas 
  for this process:   
  get the editing team together for a 
    multi-day session to go through the doc might be a way to get this done 
    quickly if folks can dedicate the time.     
    
having a primary editor for the doc as a 
    whole is the best way to get consistency especially on style, but since the 
    doc is so large, we may want to split it into sections and appoint a primary 
    editor and associated review team for each. 
    
terminology is not used consistently - we 
    should establish definitions and usage for words throughout 
  

Let me know if I missed 
  anything.   
Regards, Diane
IBM 
   Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 
  8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 
845-491-5709

wsbpel-spec-edit message