[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: grammar mistake for <onAlarm> (repeatEvery can be used on its own)
Hi all, Dieter kindly reports a grammar mistake for <onAlarm>. <repeatEvery> can be used on its own, while the XSD and a small part of the spec text does not capture that properly. I would like to remind people that: when I got the pen next time, I would fix this "repeatEvery" issue. Thanks! Regards, Alex Yiu Alex Yiu wrote: > yes I guess I may have accidentally omitted the standalone nature > "repeatEvery" for "onAlarm", when I applied XSD changes. I think we > can fix the problem by applying minor changes to the XSD and gramar > notation (i.e. '*' '?' '+' ) in spec text. That can be done without > opening a new issue, I think. Dieter Koenig1 wrote: > Attribute "repeatEvery" can be used by itself (without "for" and/or > "until", as introduced in the resolution of issue 43, but not correctly > reflected in the XSD)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]