[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Notes from Nov 22 call
Done. I've put the text you added as an editing note. Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Assaf Arkin [mailto:arkin@intalio.com] > Sent: 06 December 2005 03:31 > To: Peter Furniss > Cc: 'Francisco Curbera'; 'Diane Jordan'; > wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Notes from Nov 22 call > > > Peter, > > You can mark both 209 and 214 as fixed. > > For 214, I added the following text in 13.5.1: > > When using the <fromPart> elements, each <fromPart> element > constitutes > a declaration of a variable of that name within an implicit scope > associated with the event handler. The variable type is > derived from the > type of the corresponding message part. > > This makes the use of fromPart element and variable attribute > consistent: both declare the named variable in the onEvent implicit > scope using the message type/element (variable attribute) or message > part type (fromPart element). > > Assaf > > > Peter Furniss wrote: > > >I have marked 82.3, 99, 107 and 109 as In spec as of 30 November. > > > >There are notes against 209 and 214 (see > >http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html#e > dit_table) > >that these resolutions were included but aren't quite right. > Are these > >qualifications correct or have they been sorted out. > > > > > >scores now are 14 open, 9 resolution proposed, 4 received, and 12 > >resolved-needing-editing, 229 finished. Nearly there ! > > > >Peter > > > >----------------------------------- > >Chief Scientist > >Choreology Ltd > >web: www.choreology.com <-- now with Cohesions 3.0 available for > >download ! > > > >email: peter.furniss@choreology.com > >phone: +44 20 8313 1833 > >mobile: +44 7951 536168 > > > > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com] > >>Sent: 30 November 2005 21:34 > >>To: Diane Jordan > >>Cc: wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org > >>Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Notes from Nov 22 call > >> > >> > >>I completed my edits, sorry it took longer than I anticipated. > >>Incorporating 107 into 82 was a bit messier than expected > and I had to > >>draft Rania to help me make sense of it all. The pen goes > to Assaf, I > >>believe. > >> > >>Paco > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Diane > >> > >> Jordan/Raleigh/IB To: > >><wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org> > >> > >> M@IBMUS cc: > >> > >> Subject: > >>[wsbpel-spec-edit] Notes from Nov 22 call > >> > >> 11/22/2005 01:24 > >> > >> PM > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>Attendees: Alexandre, Prasad, Dieter, Alex, Vinky, Diane > >> > >>Work plan: > >>Paco is working on 82.3, 99, 107, 109 > >>Assaf (if available) to complete 209 and 214 when Paco is done Alex > >>will do 6.2 and 204, and fix the error he found: grammar > mistake for > >><onAlarm> (repeatEvery can be used on its > >>own) Vinky will do 82.2 Alexandre will do 230, 233 As usual > >>when you complete an assignment please send an email alerting > >>the team that the pen should go to the next person in the list. > >> > >>Other discussion: > >> > >> Dieter is working on the proposals to vote for the compensation > >>related > >> issues. > >> Vinky reported that 84 doesn't look very big - he's found > >>8-10 instances > >> of static analysis checking mandated by the spec. > >> 125 is complete in the spec now. > >> I will start investigating bugzilla and/or the action item > >>list on the > >> subgroup web site for tracking editorial to do's (like > the grammar > >> mistake Alex found). Will have a suggestion by the first > >>meeting in > >> Jan. Fall back will be a spread sheet. Here is one I've > >>been using > >> (which requires manual merge with issues list editing > work list) : > >> Oasis is moving to a new document retention system. > This seems to > >> include improvements in the storage and url's for > >>documents which we > >> will look forward to. At present, unless one of this team > >>sees a good > >> reason, for the editing itself I'd suggest we stick with > >>our current > >> environment on source forge rather than trying to switch horses - > >> however, if you have a different view, please let us know > >>as I haven't > >> tried to research the new system and am just reacting to > >>the possible > >> disruption any change can entail. > >> > >>For those who are celebrating it, happy thanksgiving - to > all others, > >>have a happy day anyway. Regards, Diane IBM Emerging Internet > >>Software Standards drj@us.ibm.com (919)254-7221 or > 8-444-7221, Mobile: > >>919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709 > >> > >> > >> > >>#### issues for editing team nov 22.xls has been removed from this > >>note on November 30, 2005 by Francisco Curbera > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]