Hi all,
I have applied
the following changes:
- Fixing
XSD to allow: (a) other URI in importType
(b) repeatEvery to be used standalone
- Applied
Issue 6.2 and Issue 204
Pen is available. Who is next?
Thanks!
Regards,
Alex Yiu
Alex Yiu wrote:
Diane,
Thanks! I got the pen. "Roger" .... :-)
Regards,
Alex Yiu
Diane Jordan wrote:
Thanks Assaf and Peter.
Alex,
I think the pen goes to you now -
here
are my notes from the last call:
Alex will
do 6.2 and 204, and fix the error he found: grammar mistake for
<onAlarm>
(repeatEvery can be used on its own)
Let us know if this is ok.
Thanks.
Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
----- Forwarded by
Diane
Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 12/05/2005 11:21 PM -----
Peter,
You can mark both 209 and 214 as fixed.
For 214, I added the following text in 13.5.1:
When using the <fromPart> elements, each <fromPart> element
constitutes
a declaration of a variable of that name within an implicit scope
associated with the event handler. The variable type is derived from
the
type of the corresponding message part.
This makes the use of fromPart element and variable attribute
consistent: both declare the named variable in the onEvent implicit
scope using the message type/element (variable attribute) or message
part type (fromPart element).
Assaf
Peter Furniss wrote:
>I have marked 82.3, 99, 107 and 109 as In spec as of 30 November.
>
>There are notes against 209 and 214 (see
>http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html#edit_table)
>that these resolutions were included but aren't quite right. Are
these
>qualifications correct or have they
>been sorted out.
>
>
>scores now are 14 open, 9 resolution proposed, 4 received, and 12
>resolved-needing-editing, 229 finished. Nearly there !
>
>Peter
>
>-----------------------------------
>Chief Scientist
>Choreology Ltd
>web: www.choreology.com <-- now
with Cohesions 3.0 available
for
>download !
>
>email: peter.furniss@choreology.com
>phone: +44 20 8313 1833
>mobile: +44 7951 536168
>
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com]
>>Sent: 30 November 2005 21:34
>>To: Diane Jordan
>>Cc: wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org
>>Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Notes from Nov 22 call
>>
>>
>>I completed my edits, sorry it took longer than I
>>anticipated. Incorporating 107 into 82 was a bit messier than
>>expected and I had to draft Rania to help me make sense of it
>>all. The pen goes to Assaf, I believe.
>>
>>Paco
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Diane
>>
>>
Jordan/Raleigh/IB To:
>><wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>
>>
>>
M@IBMUS
cc:
>>
>>
Subject:
>>[wsbpel-spec-edit] Notes from Nov 22 call
>>
>>
11/22/2005 01:24
>>
>>
PM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Attendees: Alexandre, Prasad, Dieter, Alex, Vinky, Diane
>>
>>Work plan:
>>Paco is working on 82.3, 99, 107, 109
>>Assaf (if available) to complete 209 and 214 when Paco is
>>done Alex will do 6.2 and 204, and fix the error he found:
>>grammar mistake for <onAlarm> (repeatEvery can be used on
its
>>own) Vinky will do 82.2 Alexandre will do 230, 233 As usual
>>when you complete an assignment please send an email alerting
>>the team that the pen should go to the next person in the list.
>>
>>Other discussion:
>>
>> Dieter is working on the proposals to vote for the
>>compensation related
>> issues.
>> Vinky reported that 84 doesn't look very big - he's found
>>8-10 instances
>> of static analysis checking mandated by the spec.
>> 125 is complete in the spec now.
>> I will start investigating bugzilla and/or the action item
>>list on the
>> subgroup web site for tracking editorial to do's (like
the grammar
>> mistake Alex found). Will have a suggestion by the
first
>>meeting in
>> Jan. Fall back will be a spread sheet. Here
is one I've
>>been using
>> (which requires manual merge with issues list editing work
list) :
>> Oasis is moving to a new document retention system. This
seems to
>> include improvements in the storage and url's for
>>documents which we
>> will look forward to. At present, unless one of this
team
>>sees a good
>> reason, for the editing itself I'd suggest we stick with
>>our current
>> environment on source forge rather than trying to switch
horses -
>> however, if you have a different view, please let us know
>>as I haven't
>> tried to research the new system and am just reacting to
>>the possible
>> disruption any change can entail.
>>
>>For those who are celebrating it, happy thanksgiving - to all
>>others, have a happy day anyway. Regards, Diane IBM Emerging
>>Internet Software Standards drj@us.ibm.com (919)254-7221 or
>>8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
>>
>>
>>
>>#### issues for editing team nov 22.xls has been removed from
>>this note on November 30, 2005 by Francisco Curbera
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
|