wsbpel-spec-edit message

Subject: updated spec editing status

From: Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com>
To: <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>, Rania Khalaf <rkhalaf@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:23:53 -0400

Dieter,
Thanks. I closed the rest of the action items you worked on.
I thought you or Rania also applied the remaining bit of 82.3 and 302 (action items 133 and 134) and verified this in the version you posted to the TC. However, it seems that the new words for 302 in section 13.3.4 didn't get added exactly as intended (see http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200607/msg00008.html). The result doesn't read right. What was added is the exact motion that was passed:
"Adding declarations of variables, partner links, and correlation sets in existing scopes MUST NOT be done if they hide existing declarations that are used by existing constructs in the scope."
But, it is part of a bulleted list that starts: " A valid executable completion MUST NOT add: " and should have been reworded to fit that context. The wording that fits with the bulleted list is :

"declarations of variables, partner links, and correlation sets in existing scopes if they hide existing declarations that are used by existing constructs in the scope."

I'll open an action item to catch this and close 133 and 134.

Assuming 82.3 and 302 are done, remaining issues to be applied now are:
Issue 84 Require Static Analysis Description & List (close when 247 fixes are applied)
Issue 105 XML namespaces used in spec and examples need to be defined
Issue 240 Glossary term to encompass variable type, element, messageType (Since we don't have a glossary, not sure whether there is further action required on this)
Issue 247 What goes into the static analysis table? (This can be closed when the fixes we decided on in the last call are applied)
Issue 294.1 Clarification of normative status of XML Schemas and decisions on preferred design patterns
Issue 294.2 Clarification namespace usage in Abstract and Executable Process
Issue 298 Partner Relationships

Remaining open action items are:
30 Update status section with template wording from OASIS and remove hyperlinks . replace with references.
48 Clarity of extensible 'things' in 12.7
50 Inconsistency between import section and BNF/Schema
51 Check updates for Appendix on processor MUST reject the process ..
60 Spell checking
62 Verify that we are using the latest OASIS spec template and whatever style rules they have
77 editing team - make sure there is consistent font treatment when terms are defined.
80 Cross reference in Section 8.3
83 Section 8.2.6, propertyAlias and multiple nodes
88 Cross reference for control dependency rule, Section 11.6.2
95 Apply Issue 259 (rename of ForEach Attribute to successfulBranchesOnly") resolution to XSD's
97 Editors: Consider moving 12.4.4 into it's own 12.x section during public review.
99 Editors: use vertical bar syntax to indicate exclusive-OR syntax, as per the syntax at the beginning of 12.5
113 Attribute 'target' in compensateScope is not optional as indicated in chapter 5.2 with the '?' in the basic syntax.
137 Correct wording for resolution of issue 302

Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

----- Forwarded by Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 07/27/2006 03:24 PM -----

Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com>
07/27/2006 08:47 AM

To
wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org, vmehta@DELOITTE.com, Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@erebor.co.uk>, Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

cc
Rania Khalaf <rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com>, Thomas Schulze <ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com>, Simon D Moser <SMOSER@de.ibm.com>

Subject
Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] [wsbpel] I RELEASE THE PEN NOW - VINKY IS NEXT

>>>>> I RELEASE THE PEN NOW - VINKY IS NEXT <<<<< I finished the following to-do items: - Issues 291, 292, 297, 301, 303, 304 - Action Items 71, 136, 41, 108, 135 I checked two documents into CVS: - "wsbpel-specification-draft.doc" revision 1.164 - with change tracking - "wsbpel-specification-draft.doc" revision 1.165 - without change tracking - candidate for approval as committee draft I also uploaded these documents to the OASIS website: - "wsbpel-specification-draft revision 1.164.doc" - with change tracking http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.php/19383/wsbpel-specification-draft%20revision%201.164.doc - "wsbpel-specification-draft revision 1.165.doc" - without change tracking - candidate for approval as committee draft http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.php/19384/wsbpel-specification-draft%20revision%201.165.doc Peter, please remove issues 291, 292, 297, 301, 303, 304 from the list of " Resolved issues awaiting editing into spec". Diane, please close the spec editing action items 41, 108, 135. If there is no objection (see remarks below), also close action items 19, 35, 39. Vinky, please have a look at the following changes for static analysis: - With issue resolution 303, we have a new item, temporarily named [ SA00081a] - With issue resolution 304, item [SA00049] has been deleted - With action item 71, item [SA00047] is now referenced in five places, the static analysis table entry has all five backward links Additional Remarks for the Editing Team - Action item 41: indentation (3 blanks) and syntax highlighting created with Eclipse XML editor - Action item 41: I found more example snippets in Appendix D after I uploaded the documents - I will finish this work on another cycle in a few days :-))) - Action item 19: IMO, this one is done and can be closed - the reference section is now revised - Action item 35: IMO, this one is done and can be closed - replaced by issues 294.x - Action item 39: IMO, this one is done and can be closed - different color highlighting for syntax/examples is done, captions are not needed Finally, note the Word sometimes has trouble with a large number of changes - I could not always view the complete document with the "Final Showing Markup" view AND in the "Print Layout" - the version where all changes are accepted works fine. Kind Regards DK Dieter König Mail: dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH Senior Technical Staff Member Tel (office): (+49) 7031-16-3426 Schönaicher Strasse 220 Architect, Business Process Choreographer Fax (office): (+49) 7031-16-4890 71032 Böblingen Member, Technical Expert Council Tel (home office): (+49) 7032-201464 Germany Dieter Koenig1/Germany/I BM@IBMDE To wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.o 19.07.2006 19:16 rg cc Rania Khalaf <rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com>, Thomas Schulze/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> Subject [wsbpel-spec-edit] [wsbpel] I TAKE THE PEN NOW I TAKE THE PEN NOW I will serialize the access to the spec between Rania, Thomas and myself :-) I will return it early next week - probably on Tuesday. Kind Regards DK Dieter König Mail: dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH Senior Technical Staff Member Tel (office): (+49) 7031-16-3426 Schönaicher Strasse 220 Architect, Business Process Choreographer Fax (office): (+49) 7031-16-4890 71032 Böblingen Member, Technical Expert Council Tel (home office): (+49) 7032-201464 Germany ----- Forwarded by Dieter Koenig1/Germany/IBM on 19.07.2006 19:13 ----- Dieter Koenig1/Germany/I BM To 19.07.2006 17:39 cc Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com>, wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org, wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.o rg Subject Re: [wsbpel] spec editing status - volunteers needed!(Document link: Dieter's Mail) The editing pen (the lock) must be passed explicitly. Kind Regards DK Dieter König Mail: dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH Senior Technical Staff Member Tel (office): (+49) 7031-16-3426 Schönaicher Strasse 220 Architect, Business Process Choreographer Fax (office): (+49) 7031-16-4890 71032 Böblingen Member, Technical Expert Council Tel (home office): (+49) 7032-201464 Germany Rania Khalaf <rkhalaf@watson.i bm.com> To Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> 19.07.2006 16:24 cc wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.o rg, wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org Subject Re: [wsbpel] spec editing status - volunteers needed! I volunteer for 133 and 134. What's the way to do this so I don't mess with the version control. I don' thave access to the CVS. If someone from the editing team sends me the latest draft, I can make these updates and send it back to them to commit. thanks, Rania Diane Jordan wrote: I've gone through and closed the last batch of action items that Dieter worked on per his June 26 email ( http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/email/archives/200606/msg00021.html ). These included 63, 24, 46, 59, 64, 125, 129, 16, 25, 28, 53, 57, 68, 74, 79, 84, 94, 96, 100. I suppressed the individual emails announcing these closures and so am copying the full group on this email. Is there anyone who has some free time to devote to editing? We have 25 remaining action items (35, 37, 39, 41, 48, 50, 51, 52, 60, 62, 71, 77, 80, 83, 88, 95, 97, 99, 108, 109, 113, 133, 134), and 10 issues (82.3, 84, 105, 240, 247, 302, 292, 297, 298, 301 ) awaiting editing into the spec. 84 and 247 have been applied by Vinky, but he noted 3 problems in his email ( http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/email/archives/200607/msg00000.html ) that we need to address before we declare the static analysis table complete. Please let me know if you can pitch in to make progress on completing these. Regards, Diane IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards drj@us.ibm.com (919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php