From: Diane Jordan
[mailto:drj@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 5:41
PM
To:
wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org; sallystamand@yahoo.com
Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] member
list in spec
Hi Mike,
Second
question first - the standard faults section should be Appendix A.
On
the first question, we passed a motion on who to include in the member list. (see:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/email/archives/200606/msg00206.html
) Here it is:
This
is the methodology we decided on on today's call for determining inclusion in
Appendix J:.
In the acknowledgement appendix, create 2 sub-sections: 1 listing current
members and voting members, and 2) listing anyone that was a member/voting
member in the past but is no longer (exlude all observers)
This should be effective as of today and including any new members/voting
members
Member affiliation on the ack list will be determined according to the
following:
1 current affilaiton for those still on the roster
2 affiliation shown on the roster at the time they were members for those no
longer on the roster
3 personal request to have affiliation changed
Also, anyone who requests to be removed from this list will be removed.
Sally
has started the work of updating hte list of members. Here is the last
email she sent on this with a spreadsheet she put together. I need to go
back and check that we've picked up people who were members earlier and have
left the group/oasis but haven't had time to do that.
Attached is a member list for inclusion in the specification. It reflects the
ground rules outlined in Diane's email of June 28. That date becomes the
dividing line for the 2 sheets 1) current members and 2) membership at some
time in the life of the committee.
I have added people based on emails from Monica & Alex. I have not received
any emails from any one else. However Peter raised the issue of listing
multiple affliations. A decision needs to be made on that, including how many
affliations & what order (current with 1 prior affliation, the affiliation
started with and 1 or more additional ones).
Based on my time on the TC the list has some anomolies in it but I have no
access to records to resolve questions.
Sorry I had to leave the call early. Let me know if there is anything else I
can do.
Sally
Also,
if you have the time, could you verify that all the people who have made
updates to the spec per the change log are in the editors list please?
Thanks.
Regards,
Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile:
919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
"Marin, Mike"
<MMarin@filenet.com>
08/14/2006 07:21 PM
|
To
|
Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
<wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Mike has the pen
|
|
Few other questions:
1- With respect to updating the list of members, I understand
that I should take the list of members from the OASIS wsbpel roster and merge
it with the list in the specification. Is this the correct procedure? And
second, should I use the complete wsbpel roster including observers?
2- The current specification has section that starts with
letters (for example: “A. Standard Faults”). The OASIS template
uses the word Appendix in those cases (for example: “Appendix A. Standard
Faults”). Should I go ahead and do that change?
--
Regards,
Mike Marin
From: Diane Jordan
[mailto:drj@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 6:23 AM
To: wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Mike has the pen
Thanks Mike. Please note the additional comment from Mary that's not
included in action item 62 -
Apparently the Word file has lost its styles (page breaks, running footers,
etc.) Check out the word templates at docs.oasis-open.org/templates/ ... I
think you have the right bits, but the actual style information seems to have
been lost? Let me know if you help and I'll see what I can do.
If the OASIS template doesn't provide enough information, let me know and we
can get back to her for specifics on what they want.
After the call on Wed, we'll have to incorporate the xsd and then circulate to
the committee for approval of the candiate for public review.
Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile:
919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
----- Forwarded by Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 08/14/2006 09:19 AM -----
"Marin, Mike"
<MMarin@filenet.com>
08/11/2006 07:15 PM
|
To
|
Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
<wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] remaining spec editing
work - pen is idle
|
|
I can take the pen, and do action item 62, starting on Monday afternoon. I can
have the pen for two days until Wednesday afternoon. I should be able to
complete action item 62 and update the member list.
--
Regards,
Mike Marin
From: Diane Jordan [mailto:drj@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 3:07 PM
To: wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] remaining spec editing work - pen is
idle
Importance: High
Hi
The pen is idle - any volunteers? Other than the xsd and member list to
finish and incorporate, I think we're close to done. I sent the last CD
to Mary at OASIS to have her review it and her comments are below (also see
action item 62 - only open one now!).
Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile:
919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
----- Forwarded by Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 08/11/2006 04:01 PM -----
"Mary McRae"
<marypmcrae@gmail.com>
08/11/2006 03:55 PM
Please
respond to
<mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
|
|
To
|
Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
RE: BPEL almost ready for public review
|
|
Hi Diane,
Apparently the Word file has lost its styles (page breaks, running footers,
etc.) Check out the word templates at docs.oasis-open.org/templates/ ... I
think you have the right bits, but the actual style information seems to have
been lost? Let me know if you help and I'll see what I can do.
m
From: Diane Jordan [mailto:drj@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 3:42 PM
To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: BPEL almost ready for public review
Thanks Mary - here is the doc file that we're editing:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=19482&wg_abbrev=wsbpel
I'll put you on the agenda for this coming meeting.
Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile:
919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
"Mary McRae"
<marypmcrae@gmail.com>
08/11/2006 01:37 PM
Please
respond to
<mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
|
|
To
|
Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
RE: BPEL almost ready for public review
|
|
Hi Diane,
Thanks for asking :-) Let's do a couple of things.
1. location: let's use a persistent URI such as http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/v2.0/
When it's ready, you upload it to Kavi and send me the link, and I'll upload to
docs.oasis-open.org
2. Status: Please use the template boilerplate text as follows:
This
document was last revised or approved by the WS-BPEL TC on the above date. The
level of approval is also listed above. Check the current location noted above
for possible later revisions of this document. This document is updated
periodically on no particular schedule.
Technical
Committee members should send comments on this specification to the Technical
Committee’s email list. Others should send comments to the Technical
Committee by using the “Send A Comment” button on the Technical
Committee’s web page at www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsbpel.
For
information on whether any patents have been disclosed that may be essential to
implementing this specification, and any offers of patent licensing terms,
please refer to the Intellectual Property Rights section of the Technical Committee
web page ( www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsbpel/ipr.php.)
The
non-normative errata page for this specification is located at www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsbpel.
3. Update the Notices section to match the template
boilerplate:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASIS_Specification_Template_v2-0_Legacy.html -- Notices section
4. Remove section G (this is covered in the Status section)
Is the TC authoring the spec in HTML? If not, I'll need that version as well. I
can't check the running footers in the HTML version.
I should be able to make the meeting on the 16th; I don't think there's any
changes in the process that would impact BPEL going forward. The biggest change
is around new charter intake and specs will be required to be submitted in
XHTML (rather than HTML). Jamie should be getting the new version uploaded in
the next few days.
Regards,
Mary
From: Diane Jordan [mailto:drj@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:02 AM
To: marypmcrae@gmail.com; tc-admin@oasis-open.org
Cc: James Bryce Clark; Michael Winters; jevdemon@microsoft.com
Subject: BPEL almost ready for public review
Hi Mary,
We've just approved what we think is the public review -1 committee draft:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19511/wsbpel-specification-draft-Aug01-2006.htm
Would you please take a look at it and let me know if there are any formatting
issues remaining.
Would it be possible for you to spend an hour with the TC - either as
part of the next call on Aug 16 (8-10am pacific) or on another date - to go
over a few process questions? I understand there are some new process
updates in progress - it would be helpful to have info on any that may effect
specs that are "in flight".
Thanks.
Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile:
919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709