[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Revisions to be checked into cvs
I'll take the pen and update CVS.
Kind Regards
DK
Dieter König Mail: dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Senior Technical Staff Member Tel (office): (+49) 7031-16-3426 Schönaicher Strasse 220
Architect, Business Process Choreographer Fax (office): (+49) 7031-16-4890 71032 Böblingen
Member, Technical Expert Council Tel (home office): (+49) 7032-201464 Germany
Diane Jordan
<drj@us.ibm.com>
To
19.12.2006 05:55 <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.
org>
cc
Subject
[wsbpel-spec-edit] Revisions to be
checked into cvs
Hi,
The doc version of the spec at
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.php/21572/wsbpel-specification-public_review_draft_2.doc
includes the editing changes Mary requested and formatting changes that
were required for the xhtml.
We need to make sure it gets checked into cvs with appropriate change logs.
Anyone avialable to handle that?
Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
----- Forwarded by Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 12/18/2006 11:51 PM -----
Diane
Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To
12/18/2006 11:18 PM marypmcrae@gmail.com,
tc-admin@oasis-open.org
cc
wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org,
alex.yiu@oracle.com
Subject
[wsbpel] WS BPEL 2.0 public review
draft 2 - corrected
Hi Mary,
I've corrected the points you made on the second public review draft:
1. Date - please change to 20 November 2006 (rather than 20th November)
2. File name of Word Document - please change to conform with the rest of
the package (this is the pre-existing file name)
i.e. wsbpel-specification-public_review_draft_2.doc
3. Change running footer in Word document to indicate proper file name
4. Please remove spaces from the Word diff file name
Here are the resulting files:
Word file of CD approved for second public review:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.php/21572/wsbpel-specification-public_review_draft_2.doc
PDF of same:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.php/21573/wsbpel-specification_public_review_draft_2.pdf
Word file of CD with differences highlighted between first and second
public review:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.php/21574/wsbpel-specification-public_review_draft_2_diff.doc
PDF of same:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.php/21575/wsbpel-specification_public_review_draft_2_diff.pdf
Zip file with the html for the latest public review draft:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.php/21571/wsbpel-specification-public_review_draft_2_files.zip
Its not clear to me that any changes are needed in the RDDL beyond the
correction to the editors list you requested. The RDDL and the associated
url's do not have dates/versions associated with them (and I don't think
they should as they are not versions of the spec). The history of the
specification including reviews is available in the TC archives. If you
have specific guidance as to how the RDDL should be set up, please let us
know and we'll try to comply. Otherwise, please let us get started with
the second public review. This is the current RDDL:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.php/21509/docs_wsbpel_20.zip
Thanks.
Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]