[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Updated Committee Spec docs and RDDL
From: Diane Jordan [mailto:drj@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 2:41 PM
To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; jevdemon@microsoft.com; alex.yiu@oracle.com
Cc: wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: Updated Committee Spec docs and RDDL
Mary, Thanks very much.
John and Alex, please review the rddl and let us know if you have any questions.
Mary,
As usual, I have questions for you!This Version:
- How do we populate the specification uri's on the first page for this version and current version? Do you do that? eg: Specification URIs:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/CS01/wsbpel-v2.0-CS01.htmlhttp://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/CS01/wsbpel-v2.0-CS01.doc
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/CS01/wsbpel-v2.0-CS01.pdf
[mpm]yes - once the CS documents are ready I will upload them to the repository.
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/21574/wsbpel-specification-public_review_draft_2_diff.doc
- Again on the first page, I'm not sure why you chose the link you did for the previous verson - ie, the version that went into the second public review that shows changes from the first public review:
these were the links used in the PR announcement
The change marks might be confusing since they're not the changes versus "This Version" but as compared with an older version. It seems like it would make sense to point to either the clean second public review version, or a copy of the second public review versio with changes marked versus "This Version". The latter is available at: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/22037/wsbpel-specification-draft%20candidate%20CD%20Jan%2025%2007%20diff%20wit%85.pdfand http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/21993/wsbpel-specification-draft%20candidate%20CD%20Jan%2025%2007%20diff%20with%20public%20review%20%202.doc
- How do we figure out what needs to be put in the trademark field? I know we use the names of other specifications done at OASIS. Should they be there. Howe about those approved by other org's or just published by companies? I guess we'd go according to the references section to identify them - does that sound right?
[mpm]only trademarks related specifically to the WSBPEL TC should be identified in the notices section.
Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
Sent by: Mary McRae <marypmcrae@gmail.com>01/31/2007 02:03 PM
<mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "'John Evdemon'" <John.Evdemon@microsoft.com> <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org> Updated Committee Spec docs and RDDL
Hi everyone,
In order to shortcut further delays, I've taken the liberty (with Diane's okay) to update the specification with the latest cover page(s) metadata as well as update the RDDL file. There's one new bit of metadata that was recently approved by the Board of Directors concerning trademarks. More information can be found here: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/trademark.php. Note that the last paragraph in the status section contains a field for any additional terms that should be trademarked and will need to be updated.
Regards,
Mary
---------------------------------------------------
Mary P McRae
Manager of TC Administration, OASIS
email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
web: www.oasis-open.org
phone: 603.232.9090
OASIS Symposium:
"eBusiness and Open Standards:
Understanding the Facts, Fiction, and Future"
15-18 April 2007 San Diego, CA USA
http://www.oasis-open.org/events/symposium/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]