Absolutely!
In the current guidelines, there is a note
under “minimum coverage” to remind us to have both intra and inter
enterprise use cases.
In the current catalogue, there is a table
of actors that we need to fill out. The actors can be owned by any legal
entity. So for instance, we can have say three actors within one business unit
of a company. One of the actors could be a person, and the other two are systems,
all wrapped in web services. One of our abstract use cases can then describe a
process that only interacts with these three actors.
If you agree with the above, then would
either of you (Diane or Monica) have time to sketch out the legal entities,
actors and a business flow for such an intra-enterprise use case?
++Harvey
-----Original Message-----
From: Diane Jordan
[mailto:drj@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003
9:05 AM
To: bpel usecase
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-uc] Conf Call
today at 4 PM ET / 1 PM PT
I agree with Monica that it would be good to have some
scenarios that illustrate usage other than B to B - perhaps enterprise
application integration.
Regards, Diane
IBM Dynamic e-business Technologies
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123
|
|
Monica Martin
<monica.martin@sun.com>
08/12/2003 07:35 AM
|
To: John Evdemon
<jevdemon@microsoft.com>
cc: wsbpel-uc@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-uc] Conf
Call today at 4 PM ET / 1 PM PT
|
John Evdemon wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>This is a quick reminder about our conf call today at 4 PM ET / 1 PM PT.
>
>Here is the call-in information:
>
>Toll-Free (US and Canada): +1 866 500 6738
>Toll: +1 203 480 8000
>Passcode: 600345
>
>Here is a quick agenda for today's discussion:
>
>1. Discussion of Sally's template (UC Template is attached - the website
>appears to still be down)
>
>
mm1: I have provided comments to Sally.
>2. Usage scenario guidelines and catalogue (see attached docs from
>Harvey)
>
>3. Discussion/selection of initial usage scenario - I would like us to
>prep a nomination to the TC
>
>
mm1: On items #2 and #3, the catalog appears to largely concentrate on
B2B. Should we not approach this from a broader scope that also
includes the enterprise, as we develop the usage scenarios and use
cases? In addition, the addition of legal entity language seems
premature, as we have acknowledge this is possibly an area outside of
the scope of BPEL.