[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-uc] Conf Call today at 4 PM ET / 1 PM PT
>Reed: .....The rationale for having the "legal entitites" is so that when we see >web-service-1 and web-service-2 called out in BPEL, we know (outside of >BPEL) who owns what, so we can at least follow the use case, and perhaps >even test the public/private nature of abstract and executable BPEL. > >Keep in mind, even in intra-enterprise cases, ownership is still important, >and the distinction between public and private is still important. If you >still feel that "legal entities" is confusing, is there a better way to >approach this, keeping the ability to have one example world that we reuse, >with public and private parts? >........ > mm1: Isn't public/private (and even ownership to an extent) driven by what is exposed and externally observable, regardless of where it is? See what I mean, public and private is often relative. Thanks, Harvey.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]