Re: [wsbpel-uc] Suggestion: Drop the "Visibility into SOAP Headers"suggestion

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

John Evdemon wrote:

>Sid,
>
>On today's Use Case conf call [1], it was suggested that we drop your
>suggestion called "visibility into SOAP headers".  
>If I recall, your original suggestion dealt with a variety of topics but
>drilled into attachments.  
>You even offered a simple use case regarding healthcare and large
>attachments [2].   
>
>Since business processes do not typically care about how an artifact is
>attached to a message, this is probably out of scope for us.   
>The participants on today's call seemed to agree with this fact and
>thought we should drop this potential scenario.
>  
>
mm1: Actually, in the logical sense, a business process may care about 
an artifact being attached to a message. Perhaps as I suggested on the 
previous use case, you should pend for more near-term cases.  If the 
processing affects the status of the business process, would we not care 
about it?

>Please reply if you have any questions, concerns or objections.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>John
>
>[1]
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-uc/download.php/4530
>/2003-12-15%20Meeting%20Minutes.PDF
>[2]
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-uc/download.php/4525
>/2003-12-01%20Meeting%20Minutes.pdf 
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-uc/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>  
>