OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel-uc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: Quick question/clarification regarding your discussion on scopes


Frank,

Please let me know if you have any such scenarios - I'd like to document
this for a use case.  If there are none available we'll have to define
one.

Thanks!

John


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Satish Thatte
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:31 AM
> To: ygoland@bea.com; John Evdemon
> Cc: drj@us.ibm.com; Frank Leymann
> Subject: RE: Quick question/clarification regarding your
> discussion on scopes
> 
> If I recall correctly, Frank said during the meeting that he
> could provide such examples.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yaron Y. Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:16 AM
> To: John Evdemon
> Cc: drj@us.ibm.com; Satish Thatte
> Subject: Re: Quick question/clarification regarding your
> discussion on scopes
> 
> In Satish's proposal for issues 1 & 10 he suggested the
> creation of two
> new types of scopes, permeable and impermeable. I strongly
> supported the
> introduction of impermeable scopes but was unclear as to the
> use cases
> that made permeable scopes compelling. I asked Satish if he
> could please
> provide such use cases so that we could all review them and in
> so doing
> help us decide if permeable scopes should be introduced into
> the spec.
> 	Thanks,
> 		Yaron
> 
> John Evdemon wrote:
> 
> > I heard (barely) you mention that a use case focusing on
> permeability of
> > scopes would be of interest to the TC.  Is this accurate?
> >
> > Please let me know - I appreciate any opinions on this you
> can provide.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > John



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]