[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Quick question/clarification regarding your discussion on scopes
Frank, Please let me know if you have any such scenarios - I'd like to document this for a use case. If there are none available we'll have to define one. Thanks! John > -----Original Message----- > From: Satish Thatte > Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:31 AM > To: ygoland@bea.com; John Evdemon > Cc: drj@us.ibm.com; Frank Leymann > Subject: RE: Quick question/clarification regarding your > discussion on scopes > > If I recall correctly, Frank said during the meeting that he > could provide such examples. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Yaron Y. Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:16 AM > To: John Evdemon > Cc: drj@us.ibm.com; Satish Thatte > Subject: Re: Quick question/clarification regarding your > discussion on scopes > > In Satish's proposal for issues 1 & 10 he suggested the > creation of two > new types of scopes, permeable and impermeable. I strongly > supported the > introduction of impermeable scopes but was unclear as to the > use cases > that made permeable scopes compelling. I asked Satish if he > could please > provide such use cases so that we could all review them and in > so doing > help us decide if permeable scopes should be introduced into > the spec. > Thanks, > Yaron > > John Evdemon wrote: > > > I heard (barely) you mention that a use case focusing on > permeability of > > scopes would be of interest to the TC. Is this accurate? > > > > Please let me know - I appreciate any opinions on this you > can provide. > > > > Thanks! > > > > John
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]