[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Guidelines [Was RE: [wsbpel] This telcon process doesn't work!]
Ben, et al, Nice! Over the weekend, I also tried to freshen up a bit on my recollection of basic RROO. I bumped into this (http://www.rulesonline.com) nicely presented version, which some may also find to be a convenient reference. Also, I believe our TC chairs posted a nice grid-formatted cheat sheet to the basics under 'Recent Documents' on the BPEL TC home page. That appears to be the shortest route to the absolute basics for participating in the meeting effectively. After my refresh and some reflection, I'm convinced that while strict adherence to RROO by all would allow things to work sufficiently (if only minimally) on a conf-call, we can pretty easily do much better, as per some of the recent suggestions for WebEx-like web-based systems (e.g., Gavenraj Sodhi) and/or irc/chat systems (e.g., David Burdett, Harvey Reed). I agree with Steve Ross-Talbot that one key attribute is to provide visibility to all attendees of the current speaker queue. The web-based systems provide this, I think. Finally, adding the dimension of a chat line running in parallel with the RROO-controlled formal discussion is a bit more complex (but also very interesting from a collaborative workflow standpoint). Actually, here's an idea (maybe this is what some of you meant in the first place): - Keep the main call pretty much as-is - listen-mode, speaker queue, maybe minor mods as per prior posts, web-enhanced - Add one IRC channel for "whispering and passing notes" (but note that these are visible to all, and probably logged and archived; of course folks may also have private chats going as well) - Add a second IRC channel for "points of order", for raising issues related to how the meeting is being conducted - this would allow for the 'meta' interrupts we needed last time without needing to muck with the speaker queue Just some thoughts. HTH, Rand -----Original Message----- From: Ben Bloch [mailto:ben_b54@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 1:55 PM To: donald.steiner@webv2.com; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org; Jeff Mischkinsky Cc: jamie.clark@oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Guidelines [Was RE: [wsbpel] This telcon process doesn't work!] > Robert's Rules was specifically developed to allow large groups to > discuss and make decisions efficiently, while at the same time safeguarding > the rights of the minority to be heard. However, there's a catch. The > people running the meeting AND the members have to understand the rules and > know how to make them work. Although not directly applicable to telephone or online conferences, here are some URL's for RROO. the 1915 original http://www.constitution.org/rror/rror--00.htm an abridged version: http://www.robertsrules.org/ a chart: http://www.jimslaughter.com/robertsrules.htm Perhaps these or, if a revised version if it says anything different, could be posted on the TC web site, or better yet, on Oasis web site. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsbpel-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: wsbpel-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]