[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Topics for the "Review input from TC members" session of the F2FSome
I would just say: an elephant has a tail and a trunk and some legs and a body but there is still an integral elephant in there somewhere .. ;-) -----Original Message----- From: David RR Webber - XML ebusiness [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com] Sent: Sat 5/24/2003 8:31 AM To: Satish Thatte Cc: Dieter Roller; Marin, Mike; [unknown] Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Topics for the "Review input from TC members" session of the F2FSome We really, really need to get this sorted out! So far this week I've heard: BPEL is: 1) A misnomer - its not business facing its just PEL. 2) Needs to solve B2B by providing 'properties' to track state of long running dialogues 3) A web service. 4) Should really be a visual design language 5) Is a virtual Java state machine Will the real BPEL please stand up? Maybe we should rename it VSEL - Variety Show Execution Language. Thanks, DW. ================================================== Message text written by "Satish Thatte" > B2B business protocols (e.g. RosettaNet PIPs) have historically tried to build reliability into the application protocol because they couldn't count on anything else to provide reliability, but we should take advantage of the opportunity in the web services space to solve the reliability problem separately and therefore more generally for all web services to use, not just BPEL processes. Satish< --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsbpel-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: wsbpel-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]