RE: [wsbpel] A Topic for the F2F?

[David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Maciej,

In this regard - in making the voodoo easier to do - 
we should also realize that BPSS is a great "business analyst friendly"
toolset - and having the ability to define that top level in those
pictures,
and then drilldown to BPEL is a nice potential synergy.

I also liked Fred's comments about OMG / UML / XMI - with the 
continuing work on aligning these pieces - we can focus on 
BPEL at the XML level first - get that done - and then review
options at that point - on specifying bindings from various
modelling approaches.

DW.
=========================================================
Message text written by "Maciej Szefler"
>
True, but this is what everyone wants (everyone buying BPM tools). As it is
unlikely that business analysts would be capable of producing BPEL directly
(even with a naive mapping to a visual representation), the BPEL tools
should facilitate a collaboration between analysts and engineers as well as
providing higher level abstractions suitable for manipulation by an analyst
untrained in the voodoo of xpath manipulations, correlation sets, and
compensation handlers. 

Maciej Szefler<