No Subject

"there is a special shortcut for the invoke activity to inline a =
compensation handler rather than explicitly using an immediately =
enclosing scope".

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Assaf Arkin [mailto:arkin@intalio.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:13 PM
> To: Ugo Corda
> Cc: edwink@collaxa.com; Satish Thatte; Yuzo Fujishima;
> wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Implicit <sequence> macro
>=20
>=20
> Ugo Corda wrote:
>=20
> >I agree. If we decide that sequence shortcuts are not good,=20
> then we should be consistent throughout the spec and=20
> eliminate existing shortcuts. Or we should provide a=20
> rationale for why existing shortcuts like compensation are=20
> the only good ones.
> >
> >Ugo
> > =20
> >
> Where is the shortcut in compensation?
>=20
> arkin
>=20
>=20
>=20