[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Removing "compensating a process as a whole"
Yuzo, +1. Also - without clear use cases to back up the need for this, it will just be an opened source of continued frustration into the future. I also see - once we have the use case work done, and once we have the liaisons in place - we can suggest some other means to solve the extended picture - especially when the use case need is to coordinate across the architecture to achieve the desired functionality. Other teams have done this with Technical Notes and Adjuncts to the main spec' - and it works very well. Means you can focus on the core aspects and get those really done well - and not sweat trying to have the whole kitchen sink in there in the first release. Thanks, DW. ==================================================== Message text written by "Yuzo Fujishima" > Rationale 1: "compensating a process as a whole" introduces uncertainties into the specification. These uncertainties leaves the feature hardly usable in my opinion. <
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]