Re: [wsbpel] implicite links of the runtime engine (was: Implicit <sequence> macro)

[David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Arkin,

OK - that's better.  Using it in that way makes much more sense.
So long as it only defining that piece its cool - that's what its
there for - as a bridge.  It's when it not just a bridge that it
becomes an impediment not an asset.

We'll need to define our own binding into WSDL once that 
spec' looks like its stablized enough on the key aspects
we can use.

Thanks, DW.
======================================================
Message text written by Assaf Arkin
>Mobility, of the ability to execute in different environments, is given 
since the definition is based on the interface. It is not based on a 
particular protocol or end-point. So a process that uses service X with 
protocol Y in one environment would just as well use service A with 
protocol B in another environment. As long as it understands what the 
communication pattern is.
<