[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] implicite links of the runtime engine (was: Implicit <sequence> macro)
Arkin, OK - that's better. Using it in that way makes much more sense. So long as it only defining that piece its cool - that's what its there for - as a bridge. It's when it not just a bridge that it becomes an impediment not an asset. We'll need to define our own binding into WSDL once that spec' looks like its stablized enough on the key aspects we can use. Thanks, DW. ====================================================== Message text written by Assaf Arkin >Mobility, of the ability to execute in different environments, is given since the definition is based on the interface. It is not based on a particular protocol or end-point. So a process that uses service X with protocol Y in one environment would just as well use service A with protocol B in another environment. As long as it understands what the communication pattern is. <
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]