RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 23 - proposed resolution (add rationale) for TC

["Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de>]

Hello,


my suggestion:
># > The set of activities in BPEL4WS is not intended to be the minimum required set. 
># > There are cases where one activity can replace another type. For example
># > the sequence activity used to structure sequential processing may be emulated by a 
># > more complex flow, which has links, to ensure sequential processing.

was commented by Monica:
> mm1: Bernd, Perhaps we should answer questions such as when a <sequence> 
> or <flow> is used.  It may not be a question of complexity but more so a 
> usage preference. Is it not true that each can achieve the same goal? I 
> believe so. Two usage examples should be sufficient.

Hmm.. I wanted to avoid to put usage sugggestions into the text, because I am sure we wont agree on any. 

My "more complex" wording above may be a bit missleading, it only means "needs more explicite links".

Therefore I suggest:

# The set of activities in BPEL4WS is not intended to be the minimum required set. 
# There are cases where one activity can replace another type. For example
# the sequence activity used to structure sequential processing may be emulated by a 
# flow with additional links, to ensure sequential processing.

Greetings
Bernd