OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
wsbpel
379 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlationset
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 1 Oct 2003 03:15:41 -0000
Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 1 Oct 2003 03:15:35 -0000
Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances of event handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 1 Oct 2003 03:15:33 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 7 - possible resolution
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 1 Oct 2003 02:32:42 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 30 Sep 2003 23:34:09 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 30 Sep 2003 22:43:11 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set)
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 30 Sep 2003 22:22:15 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 30 Sep 2003 22:14:26 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 30 Sep 2003 22:00:25 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Setting link status in case of transition condition
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 30 Sep 2003 21:57:09 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 30 Sep 2003 21:52:44 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 30 Sep 2003 21:28:49 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 30 Sep 2003 21:11:23 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 30 Sep 2003 21:05:37 -0000
Proposal to vote on Issues at Oct. 1 TC call
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 30 Sep 2003 17:12:49 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Deadlocks and Internal Messaging
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 30 Sep 2003 17:11:41 -0000
RE: Issue - 52 - Deadlocks and Internal Messaging
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 30 Sep 2003 17:03:49 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 7 - possible resolution
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 30 Sep 2003 16:57:07 -0000
RE: Issue - 52 - Deadlocks and Internal Messaging
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 30 Sep 2003 16:51:56 -0000
Issue 7 - possible resolution
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 30 Sep 2003 16:21:53 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 20 - Proposal to vote
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 30 Sep 2003 16:13:49 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 20 - Proposal to vote
From
Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@Sun.COM> on 30 Sep 2003 15:58:19 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Setting link status in case of transition condition
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 30 Sep 2003 14:12:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set)
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 30 Sep 2003 13:53:10 -0000
Issue - 70 - suppressJoinFailure default value
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 30 Sep 2003 08:56:53 -0000
RE: Issue - 52 - Deadlocks and Internal Messaging
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 30 Sep 2003 04:33:02 -0000
BPEL questions: Q & Use Cases: UUID?
From
LI Yanming / FTR&D / US <yanming.li@rd.francetelecom.com> on 29 Sep 2003 22:54:58 -0000
Issue 20 - Proposal to vote
From
Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@Sun.COM> on 29 Sep 2003 22:31:51 -0000
Issue - 52 - Deadlocks and Internal Messaging
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 29 Sep 2003 19:04:42 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set)
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 29 Sep 2003 18:52:44 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 29 Sep 2003 09:41:11 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66- Zero or multiple matches of correlation set)
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 28 Sep 2003 09:00:54 -0000
policy annotations and BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set)
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 27 Sep 2003 23:59:31 -0000
Issue - 69 - When to clear link status
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 27 Sep 2003 12:49:13 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Yuzo Fujishima" <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 27 Sep 2003 09:01:50 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 32 - Link Semantics in Event Handlers
From
"Yuzo Fujishima" <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 27 Sep 2003 08:17:41 -0000
WS BPEL TC meeting Oct. 1
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 26 Sep 2003 22:27:06 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 26 Sep 2003 20:02:34 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 26 Sep 2003 19:43:26 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 26 Sep 2003 19:28:25 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 26 Sep 2003 19:18:37 -0000
Groups - WS BPEL TC conference call added
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 26 Sep 2003 19:11:47 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 26 Sep 2003 19:00:40 -0000
Issue - 68 - catch syntax broken
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 26 Sep 2003 18:59:58 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 26 Sep 2003 18:22:06 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] suppressJoinFailure default value
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 26 Sep 2003 17:08:22 -0000
suppressJoinFailure default value
From
jim@parasoft.com (Jim Clune) on 26 Sep 2003 16:32:33 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 26 Sep 2003 12:22:33 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 26 Sep 2003 04:57:57 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 26 Sep 2003 04:45:41 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 26 Sep 2003 04:44:00 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 26 Sep 2003 04:41:53 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 26 Sep 2003 04:40:45 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 26 Sep 2003 04:26:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 67 - Clarify semantics of serializable scopes
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 26 Sep 2003 04:22:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Setting link status in case of transition condition
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 26 Sep 2003 04:13:04 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 26 Sep 2003 04:03:55 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 26 Sep 2003 03:50:16 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 26 Sep 2003 03:18:01 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 26 Sep 2003 03:17:56 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 26 Sep 2003 00:18:26 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 25 Sep 2003 23:22:52 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 1 - Permeability of scopes
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 25 Sep 2003 23:14:02 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Maciej Szefler" <mbs@fivesight.com> on 25 Sep 2003 22:00:30 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 25 Sep 2003 19:55:54 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 25 Sep 2003 19:39:59 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 25 Sep 2003 19:08:29 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issues 26 and 49
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 25 Sep 2003 16:51:14 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Maciej Szefler" <mbs@fivesight.com> on 25 Sep 2003 16:25:31 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Maciej Szefler" <mbs@fivesight.com> on 25 Sep 2003 16:10:53 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issues 26 and 49
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 25 Sep 2003 14:31:35 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Liaison Activity - WAS: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net> on 25 Sep 2003 08:39:22 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlationset
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 25 Sep 2003 04:52:23 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Groups - 2003-09-18.BTM.BPEL.syntax.summary.ppt uploaded
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 25 Sep 2003 00:48:48 -0000
Issue 46 resolution
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 24 Sep 2003 23:45:22 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Wed Sep 24 18:59:54 2003
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 67 - Clarify semantics of serializable scopes
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 24 Sep 2003 22:43:05 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 24 Sep 2003 22:30:51 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 24 Sep 2003 22:16:25 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 24 Sep 2003 22:02:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 24 Sep 2003 22:01:26 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 24 Sep 2003 21:57:38 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Groups - 2003-09-18.BTM.BPEL.syntax.summary.ppt uploaded
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 24 Sep 2003 21:55:14 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 24 Sep 2003 21:55:13 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 24 Sep 2003 21:38:10 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 24 Sep 2003 18:49:15 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 20 - installing compensation handlers for faultedscopes
From
Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@Sun.COM> on 24 Sep 2003 18:44:34 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Groups - 2003-09-18.BTM.BPEL.syntax.summary.ppt uploaded
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 24 Sep 2003 18:44:00 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 24 Sep 2003 18:30:53 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 43 - Setting up Periodic Alarms
From
Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@Sun.COM> on 24 Sep 2003 18:16:38 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 24 Sep 2003 18:00:13 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Groups - 2003-09-18.BTM.BPEL.syntax.summary.ppt uploaded
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 24 Sep 2003 17:43:26 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 24 Sep 2003 17:15:14 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Liaison Activity - WAS: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 24 Sep 2003 16:06:28 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Liaison Activity - WAS: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 24 Sep 2003 15:56:37 -0000
Groups - 2003-09-18.BTM.BPEL.syntax.summary.ppt uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 24 Sep 2003 14:57:35 -0000
Groups - 2003-09-18.BpelUsageScenarioTransactions.ppt uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 24 Sep 2003 14:56:22 -0000
Groups - 2003-09-17.BTM.WS-BPEL.TC.Redmond.17-19.September.2003.ppt uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 24 Sep 2003 14:54:38 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 24 Sep 2003 12:00:30 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Liaison Activity - WAS: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 24 Sep 2003 11:56:46 -0000
Issue - 67 - Clarify semantics of serializable scopes
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 24 Sep 2003 08:26:57 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 24 Sep 2003 05:45:30 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlationset
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 24 Sep 2003 04:18:49 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Liaison Activity - WAS: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 24 Sep 2003 02:39:20 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Liaison Activity - WAS: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 24 Sep 2003 02:28:58 -0000
Groups - UNCEFACT_BCF_Sep_2003_Part_4.ppt uploaded
From
tony.fletcher@choreology.com on 24 Sep 2003 01:57:27 -0000
Groups - UNCEFACT_BCF_Sep_2003_Part_3.ppt uploaded
From
tony.fletcher@choreology.com on 24 Sep 2003 01:50:17 -0000
Groups - UNCEFACT_BCF_Sep_2003_Part_2.ppt uploaded
From
tony.fletcher@choreology.com on 24 Sep 2003 01:45:00 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 43 - Setting up Periodic Alarms
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 24 Sep 2003 00:39:36 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 43 - Setting up Periodic Alarms
From
"Ben Bloch" <ben_b54@hotmail.com> on 24 Sep 2003 00:32:57 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 23 Sep 2003 21:44:26 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 23 Sep 2003 21:05:23 -0000
Groups - minutes 2003-09-18.doc uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 23 Sep 2003 20:35:15 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 23 Sep 2003 18:10:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 23 Sep 2003 17:58:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 23 Sep 2003 17:25:38 -0000
Groups - UNCEFACT_BCF_Sep_2003_Part_1.ppt uploaded
From
tony.fletcher@choreology.com on 23 Sep 2003 16:37:59 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Liaison Activity - WAS: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 23 Sep 2003 16:22:10 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 43 - Setting up Periodic Alarms
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Sep 2003 15:09:23 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 41 - onMessage handler definition
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 23 Sep 2003 12:30:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Liaison Activity - WAS: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 23 Sep 2003 11:17:56 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 43 - Setting up Periodic Alarms
From
"Ben Bloch" <ben_b54@hotmail.com> on 23 Sep 2003 10:40:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 23 Sep 2003 01:28:59 -0000
Liaison Activity - WAS: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 23 Sep 2003 01:26:43 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 23 Sep 2003 01:09:35 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 43 - Setting up Periodic Alarms
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Sep 2003 00:33:16 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 41 - onMessage handler definition
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Sep 2003 00:26:53 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 20 - installing compensation handlers for faulted scopes
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Sep 2003 00:20:23 -0000
Groups - 2003-09-18 Face 2 Face Meeting - Ben.doc uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 23 Sep 2003 00:08:35 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 22 Sep 2003 22:40:14 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 22 Sep 2003 20:35:17 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 22 Sep 2003 20:14:40 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 22 Sep 2003 19:58:04 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 22 Sep 2003 19:51:44 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 22 Sep 2003 18:59:49 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 22 Sep 2003 18:33:29 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 47 - Summary of f2f discussion
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 22 Sep 2003 18:28:23 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 22 Sep 2003 17:33:34 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 22 Sep 2003 17:18:22 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] CEFACT Liaison Review
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 22 Sep 2003 17:14:08 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
Edwin Khodabakchian [mailto:edwink@collaxa.com] on Mon Sep 22 11:59:09 2003
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Brown, Steve" <SBrown@Metastorm.com> on 22 Sep 2003 15:17:21 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Maciej Szefler" <mbs@fivesight.com> on 22 Sep 2003 14:11:17 -0000
Issue - 20 - installing compensation handlers for faulted scopes
From
Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@Sun.COM> on 22 Sep 2003 00:39:38 -0000
Issue - 41 - onMessage handler definition
From
Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@Sun.COM> on 21 Sep 2003 23:36:13 -0000
Issue - 43 - Setting up Periodic Alarms
From
Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@Sun.COM> on 21 Sep 2003 23:24:43 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 21 Sep 2003 19:27:26 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 21 Sep 2003 16:59:42 -0000
Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 20 Sep 2003 17:12:21 -0000
CEFACT Liaison Review
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 20 Sep 2003 13:12:15 -0000
Groups - 2003-09-18 Face 2 Face Meeting - Steve.doc uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 19 Sep 2003 19:49:07 -0000
Groups - http://webster.disa.org/cefact-groups/tmg/bcf-tour/agenda.html uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 19 Sep 2003 19:43:25 -0000
Groups - http://webster.disa.org/cefact-groups/tmg/bcf-tour/agenda.html uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 19 Sep 2003 19:42:53 -0000
Groups - 2003-09-19 Face 2 Face Meeting - Peter.txt uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 19 Sep 2003 19:38:33 -0000
Groups - 2003-09-17 Face 2 Face Meeting - Maciej.doc uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 19 Sep 2003 19:35:59 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 19 Sep 2003 19:25:46 -0000
Groups - WSBPEL F2F minutes 20030917.doc uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 19 Sep 2003 19:16:23 -0000
Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Maciej Szefler" <mbs@fivesight.com> on 19 Sep 2003 17:23:51 -0000
Groups - f2f-notes-9-18.doc uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 19 Sep 2003 15:23:29 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Groups - 2003-09-17 F2F - Use Cases.PDF uploaded
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 19 Sep 2003 05:07:07 -0000
Groups - Dieter - Event Handler Issues.ppt uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 18 Sep 2003 20:51:55 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Setting link status in case of transition condition
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 18 Sep 2003 20:24:53 -0000
Issue 27 - Setting link status in case of transition condition
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 18 Sep 2003 18:50:52 -0000
Issue - 3 - Six sub-points from Redmond F2F discussion
From
"Green, Alastair J." <Alastair.Green@choreology.com> on 18 Sep 2003 17:44:32 -0000
Phone line disconnected
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 18 Sep 2003 17:41:24 -0000
Groups - Satish Presentation.ppt uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 18 Sep 2003 16:39:17 -0000
Groups - Copy of Dieter's Slide.ppt uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 18 Sep 2003 16:36:25 -0000
Attention: F2F Callers - use IRC
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 18 Sep 2003 15:58:45 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Groups - 2003-09-17 F2F - Use Cases.PDF uploaded
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 18 Sep 2003 15:29:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Groups - 2003-09-17 F2F - Use Cases.PDF uploaded
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 18 Sep 2003 14:08:48 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Groups - 2003-09-17 F2F - Use Cases.PDF uploaded
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 18 Sep 2003 03:36:13 -0000
Groups - WS BPEL TC Face to Face meeting modified
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 17 Sep 2003 23:36:14 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Can Serializable Scope protect concurrent access within a <flow> ?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 17 Sep 2003 21:29:54 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 17 Sep 2003 21:09:11 -0000
Groups - 2003-09-17 F2F - Use Cases.PDF uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 17 Sep 2003 20:57:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 17 Sep 2003 18:20:15 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 17 Sep 2003 16:33:49 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 64 - Explicit declaration of process instantiation
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 17 Sep 2003 14:58:16 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 17 Sep 2003 14:02:09 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 64 - Explicit declaration of process instantiation
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 17 Sep 2003 12:54:37 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 64 - Explicit declaration of process instantiation
From
"Dieter Roller" <ROL@de.ibm.com> on 17 Sep 2003 11:59:02 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
"Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com> on 17 Sep 2003 09:26:50 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 17 Sep 2003 04:58:24 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 17 Sep 2003 02:16:14 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
"Maciej Szefler" <mbs@fivesight.com> on 17 Sep 2003 01:47:21 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Information on F2F meeting...(Includes Dial-in information)
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 16 Sep 2003 20:16:40 -0000
Information on F2F meeting...(Includes Dial-in information)
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 16 Sep 2003 20:11:01 -0000
Information on F2F meeting...(Includes Dial-in information)
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 16 Sep 2003 19:53:42 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 64 - Explicit declaration of process instantiation
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 16 Sep 2003 17:34:59 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 16 Sep 2003 17:18:15 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 16 Sep 2003 16:46:12 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 64 - Explicit declaration of process instantiation
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 16 Sep 2003 16:19:46 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 16 Sep 2003 12:45:57 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 16 Sep 2003 05:53:43 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 16 Sep 2003 05:32:29 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 16 Sep 2003 05:29:20 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 16 Sep 2003 05:13:10 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 16 Sep 2003 02:29:12 -0000
Issue 25: Consistent enablement of compensation handlers
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 16 Sep 2003 02:12:03 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 15 Sep 2003 23:59:57 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 64 - Explicit declaration of process instantiation
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 15 Sep 2003 23:25:42 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 15 Sep 2003 23:00:02 -0000
Issue 47 - presentation on key changes in WSDL1.2 (was RE: [wsbpel] Fw: Agenda for Sept. 17-19 WS BEPL TC)
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 15 Sep 2003 22:32:39 -0000
Issue - 65 - Multiple partners of a partner type
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 15 Sep 2003 20:06:35 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 15 Sep 2003 19:58:02 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 15 Sep 2003 19:25:43 -0000
Issue - 64 - Explicit declaration of process instantiation
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 15 Sep 2003 18:13:29 -0000
Issue - 63 - Support of Array
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 15 Sep 2003 18:13:29 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Support of Array
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 15 Sep 2003 16:13:58 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Can Serializable Scope protect concurrent access within a<flow> ?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 15 Sep 2003 16:13:57 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Semantic difference in the first <receive>
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 15 Sep 2003 16:13:56 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Fw: Agenda for Sept. 17-19 WS BEPL TC
From
"Dieter Roller" <ROL@de.ibm.com> on 15 Sep 2003 12:37:24 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Support of Array (sent on behalf of Jim Webber)
From
"Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com> on 15 Sep 2003 09:29:03 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Fw: Agenda for Sept. 17-19 WS BEPL TC
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 15 Sep 2003 06:54:34 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Fw: Agenda for Sept. 17-19 WS BEPL TC
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 15 Sep 2003 05:53:47 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Fw: Agenda for Sept. 17-19 WS BEPL TC
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 15 Sep 2003 01:17:36 -0000
[wsbpel] 9/14/2003: Issue 53-59 Feedback on Business Transactions
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 14 Sep 2003 15:29:30 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Fw: Agenda for Sept. 17-19 WS BEPL TC
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 13 Sep 2003 20:41:49 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Semantic difference in the first <receive>
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 13 Sep 2003 17:58:09 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Semantic difference in the first <receive>
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 13 Sep 2003 17:10:20 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Support of Array
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 13 Sep 2003 16:22:22 -0000
Updated submission on BTM
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 13 Sep 2003 12:00:48 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Semantic difference in the first <receive>
From
"Dieter Roller" <ROL@de.ibm.com> on 13 Sep 2003 06:59:57 -0000
Multiple "partners" of a "partner type"
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 13 Sep 2003 04:51:51 -0000
Support of Array
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 13 Sep 2003 04:40:22 -0000
Can Serializable Scope protect concurrent access within a <flow> ?
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 13 Sep 2003 04:25:53 -0000
Semantic difference in the first <receive>
From
Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> on 13 Sep 2003 03:55:16 -0000
Fw: Agenda for Sept. 17-19 WS BEPL TC
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 12 Sep 2003 22:21:33 -0000
Issue - 62 - Event handlers and Serializable Scopes
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 12 Sep 2003 19:51:31 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliabilityA
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 12 Sep 2003 16:17:51 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 7 - Import
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 12 Sep 2003 15:44:34 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 7 - Import
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 12 Sep 2003 15:02:18 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliabilityA
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 12 Sep 2003 14:50:06 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 7 - Import
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 12 Sep 2003 13:49:11 -0000
Issue - 7 - Import
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 12 Sep 2003 01:07:56 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliabilityA
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 11 Sep 2003 02:45:55 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 10 Sep 2003 19:44:19 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliabilityA
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 10 Sep 2003 19:32:08 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 10 Sep 2003 19:03:32 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Implementation sub group
From
James Bryce Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org> on 10 Sep 2003 19:00:51 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 10 Sep 2003 18:19:56 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Implementation sub group
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 10 Sep 2003 17:26:07 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 10 Sep 2003 14:59:17 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 10 Sep 2003 13:49:31 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 9 Sep 2003 23:24:10 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 9 Sep 2003 22:51:38 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 9 Sep 2003 20:34:57 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 9 Sep 2003 19:17:02 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 9 Sep 2003 19:13:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 9 Sep 2003 18:54:36 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 9 Sep 2003 18:43:48 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 9 Sep 2003 18:24:42 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 9 Sep 2003 18:23:44 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 9 Sep 2003 18:23:15 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 9 Sep 2003 17:55:18 -0000
[wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
From
LI Yanming / FTR&D / US <yanming.li@rd.francetelecom.com> on 9 Sep 2003 17:30:08 -0000
Glossary for WSBPEL??
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 9 Sep 2003 11:15:30 -0000
Issues list hiatus
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 8 Sep 2003 20:36:08 -0000
Issue - 61 - process priority
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 8 Sep 2003 20:17:43 -0000
Issue - 60 - process category
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 8 Sep 2003 20:17:42 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 8 Sep 2003 17:10:57 -0000
RE: spamassassin messages
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 8 Sep 2003 15:04:07 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Input and Input/output
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 7 Sep 2003 20:28:48 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Input and Input/output
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 7 Sep 2003 20:16:24 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Input and Input/output
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 7 Sep 2003 20:07:55 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Input and Input/output
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 7 Sep 2003 18:23:06 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Input and Input/output
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 7 Sep 2003 16:28:01 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Sun Sep 07 03:58:11 2003
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to
From
"Dieter Roller" <ROL@de.ibm.com> on 7 Sep 2003 07:34:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: link crossing a fault-handler boundary
From
"Dieter Roller" <ROL@de.ibm.com> on 7 Sep 2003 07:11:35 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Input and Input/output
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 6 Sep 2003 01:04:07 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Input and Input/output
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 6 Sep 2003 00:29:04 -0000
Choreology Business Transaction Management Submission update and some background
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 5 Sep 2003 23:48:29 -0000
Re: Issues 26 and 49
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 5 Sep 2003 23:02:04 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 5 Sep 2003 22:55:47 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 5 Sep 2003 21:38:50 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Implementation sub group
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 5 Sep 2003 21:30:42 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Implementation sub group
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 5 Sep 2003 21:10:31 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 5 Sep 2003 19:03:56 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 5 Sep 2003 19:00:14 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 5 Sep 2003 18:54:24 -0000
Implementation sub group
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 5 Sep 2003 18:34:15 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 5 Sep 2003 18:00:28 -0000
Fw: [chairs] OASIS Media Relations
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 5 Sep 2003 17:54:39 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 5 Sep 2003 17:33:44 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Choreology Business Transaction Management Submissionupdate and some background
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 5 Sep 2003 16:17:51 -0000
Choreology Business Transaction Management Submission update and some background
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 5 Sep 2003 15:55:23 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 5 Sep 2003 13:42:10 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 5 Sep 2003 13:40:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process priority?
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 5 Sep 2003 13:38:45 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 5 Sep 2003 13:32:35 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 5 Sep 2003 13:27:49 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 5 Sep 2003 12:48:57 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 5 Sep 2003 12:27:10 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 5 Sep 2003 04:50:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 5 Sep 2003 04:26:34 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process priority?
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 5 Sep 2003 04:22:18 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process priority?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 5 Sep 2003 04:06:24 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 5 Sep 2003 04:06:22 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 5 Sep 2003 03:50:42 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 4 Sep 2003 23:06:39 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 4 Sep 2003 21:50:59 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 4 Sep 2003 21:33:38 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 4 Sep 2003 21:28:15 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process priority?
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 4 Sep 2003 21:19:08 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 4 Sep 2003 20:59:01 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 4 Sep 2003 20:50:38 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 4 Sep 2003 20:46:30 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 4 Sep 2003 20:35:13 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 4 Sep 2003 20:18:31 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process priority?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 4 Sep 2003 19:55:23 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 4 Sep 2003 19:42:01 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process priority?
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 4 Sep 2003 19:41:34 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: process priority?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 4 Sep 2003 19:39:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process category?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 4 Sep 2003 19:33:45 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process priority?
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 4 Sep 2003 18:50:09 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: process priority?
From
"Rajesh Pradhan" <rajesh@iopsis.com> on 4 Sep 2003 18:07:48 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 4 Sep 2003 16:59:24 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: process priority?
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 4 Sep 2003 16:57:37 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Q: process priority?
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 4 Sep 2003 16:46:18 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Q: process priority?
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 4 Sep 2003 16:39:19 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 4 Sep 2003 16:36:00 -0000
Q: process priority?
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 4 Sep 2003 16:35:14 -0000
Q: process category?
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 4 Sep 2003 16:35:13 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 4 Sep 2003 16:29:24 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 4 Sep 2003 13:49:31 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 4 Sep 2003 02:05:27 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Logisitics for Upcoming BPEL F2F
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 3 Sep 2003 23:37:10 -0000
Regrets- TC con call today
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 3 Sep 2003 21:41:53 -0000
Logisitics for Upcoming BPEL F2F
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 3 Sep 2003 20:28:20 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] a few points of immediate interest in the revision of OASIS TC Process
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 3 Sep 2003 19:58:50 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] a few points of immediate interest in the revision of OASIS TCProcess
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 3 Sep 2003 19:47:37 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] a few points of immediate interest in the revision of OASIS TC Process
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 3 Sep 2003 18:23:43 -0000
Issue - 52 - Issue on Pause
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 3 Sep 2003 17:54:28 -0000
Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 3 Sep 2003 17:54:12 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 3 Sep 2003 17:34:22 -0000
[wsbpel] 9/3/2003: Issues Categories for Discussion - Update fromSuggestion
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 3 Sep 2003 16:37:48 -0000
Re: Issue - 52 - Issue Summary
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 3 Sep 2003 16:21:51 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] [Fwd: [wsbpel-reqts] [bpel-rqmts[ Jordan 8/29/2003: Issues Categories for Discussion Boundaries]
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 3 Sep 2003 16:15:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 3 Sep 2003 16:05:02 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] [Fwd: [wsbpel-reqts] [bpel-rqmts[ Jordan 8/29/2003:Issues Categories for Discussion Boundaries]
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 3 Sep 2003 16:00:09 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] [Fwd: [wsbpel-reqts] [bpel-rqmts[ Jordan 8/29/2003: Issues Categories for Discussion Boundaries]
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 3 Sep 2003 15:54:07 -0000
Test - please ignore
From
Howard N Smith <howard.smith@ontology.org> on 3 Sep 2003 15:53:42 -0000
[Fwd: [wsbpel-reqts] [bpel-rqmts[ Jordan 8/29/2003: Issues Categoriesfor Discussion Boundaries]
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 3 Sep 2003 15:16:35 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 52 - Issue Summary
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 3 Sep 2003 14:27:11 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 52 - Issue Summary
From
Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> on 3 Sep 2003 13:52:59 -0000
a few points of immediate interest in the revision of OASIS TC Process
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 3 Sep 2003 13:23:23 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 52 - Issue Summary
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 3 Sep 2003 10:42:24 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 3 Sep 2003 00:22:45 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 3 Sep 2003 00:14:58 -0000
re: [wsbpel] Issue - 52 - Issue Summary
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 3 Sep 2003 00:07:45 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 2 Sep 2003 23:49:16 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 2 Sep 2003 22:14:59 -0000
Issue - 52 - Issue Summary
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 2 Sep 2003 21:45:23 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 2 Sep 2003 21:43:19 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 2 Sep 2003 21:43:11 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 2 Sep 2003 21:20:11 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 2 Sep 2003 21:15:30 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 2 Sep 2003 21:00:40 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 2 Sep 2003 20:48:20 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 2 Sep 2003 20:44:35 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 2 Sep 2003 20:20:53 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 2 Sep 2003 20:15:30 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 2 Sep 2003 17:05:30 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 2 Sep 2003 15:59:12 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM]
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 2 Sep 2003 03:13:25 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM
From
"Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com> on 1 Sep 2003 22:20:47 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 54 - Construct to hold Business transaction contexts
From
"Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com> on 1 Sep 2003 22:20:39 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM]
From
"Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com> on 1 Sep 2003 22:20:34 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM]
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 1 Sep 2003 21:06:50 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 54 - Construct to hold Business transaction contexts
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 1 Sep 2003 20:25:47 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 1 Sep 2003 16:49:11 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 54 - Construct to hold Business transaction contexts
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 1 Sep 2003 15:38:17 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 1 Sep 2003 15:28:03 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM]
From
David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> on 1 Sep 2003 15:14:25 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM]
From
"Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com> on 1 Sep 2003 11:35:25 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM
From
"Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com> on 1 Sep 2003 11:31:33 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 54 - Construct to hold Business transaction contexts
From
"Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com> on 1 Sep 2003 11:19:30 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Should include Business Transaction Management (BTM) programming constructs compatible with WS-T, BTP and WS-TXM
From
"Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com> on 1 Sep 2003 10:18:17 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2