RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0

I will create a new issue for BP1.0 discussion. I will also prepare a few slides to summarize the BP1.0 recommendations on WSDL1.1 and send it to the list as soon as the new issue number for BP1.0 is available. Hopefully that will provide us the necessary information to have more productive discussion.

Best Regards,
Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Prasad Yendluri
Cc: BPEL OASIS
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0

For the benefit of the non-expert could post a salient example please? Specifically, a BPEL usage pattern that would not work if BP 1.0 is followed but would work if any WSDL 1.1 portType is allowed. In other words, is BP 1.0 a restriction on the WSDL artifacts we use or potentially on BPEL itself?

From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:11 AM
To: Satish Thatte
Cc: BPEL OASIS
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0

The sections 5.5 and 5.6 in the basic profile (http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/Basic/2003-08/BasicProfile-1.0a.htm) are devoted to binding aspects but, several major sections including section 4, other sections of 5 address abstract aspects of WSDL, which is a pretty large portion. All those are applicable BPEL IMO.

Prasad

Satish Thatte wrote:

Most of the BP 1.0 directives are binding related. BP also forbids outbound operations which BPEL does not use. Can someone identify a directive in BP 1.0 that actually affects BPEL?

Satish

wsbpel message