OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 - Proposal to vote - What to do with WSDL1.2?

Hello Kevin,

> I propose to close issue 47 without specific change to the specification.

I think this wording is less confusing than the 3 point email we discussed in the phone call. Therefore I can agree with that. Perhaps we can have a more verbose motion, for the archives?

"The initialy submitted document of BPEL1.1 was designed based on WSDL1.1 (a W3C Note), because it was the single most commonly used service description framework. Current work towards future WSDL revisions (1.2) will require some changes to BPEL, and in addition there is no normative version (e.g. W3C Reccomendation) beeing expected before the final draft of resultant specification at the end of the initially charted 9month period in March 2004.

I would like to avoid making statments after that milestone. Especially since the charter explecitely asks the TC for a suggestion list then.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Bernd Eckenfels
Chief Architect
SEEBURGER AG - Edisonstr.1 , D-75015 Bretten, Germany
Fax: +49 (0)7252 96-2400 - Phone: +49 (0)7252 96-1256
mailto:b.eckenfels@seeburger.de - http://www.seeburger.de

-----Original Message-----
From: Liu, Kevin [mailto:kevin.liu@sap.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 2:34 AM
To: 'wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org'
Cc: 'Diane Jordan'; Liu, Kevin
Subject: [wsbpel] Issue 47 - Proposal to vote - What to do with WSDL1.2?

Issue 47 ([1]) was created to have a general discussion about what to do with WSDL1.2 (or whatever version number W3C WSD WG may call it eventually, same below)

As discussed in the Redmond F2F ([2]) and the Oct.1 con call, we agreed not to use WSDL1.2 for WSBPEL since it is still under construction and its availability is still uncertain.  

We will try to align with WSDL1.2 work via identifying and addressing particular relevant feature changes. Issue 71 and Issue 15 will be used to clarify potential impacts of removal of message construct and WSDL1.2 patterns

I propose to close issue 47 without specific change to the specification.

As a side note, the discussion around issue 47 has also generated the following results:
 - Issue 72 has been created for discussion on WS-I BP1.0
-  Issue 71 has been created to investigate the potential impact of the removal of wsdl message construct. 
-  A liaison with W3C WSD WG has been created

Best Regards, 
[1] http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html#Issue47
[2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200309/msg00242.html 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]