[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions
I'm confused .. can you give an example of what you mean by "abstract messages that are not part of an abstract operation"? Maybe I haven't understood what you have in mind .. Thanks, Sanjiva. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; "Francisco Curbera" <curbera@us.ibm.com> Cc: "Ron Ten-Hove" <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM>; "Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>; <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>; <ygoland@bea.com> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 7:04 AM Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions > So are you saying that WSIF can only process a subset of all the legal (according to WSDL 1.1) WSDL files? (Please notice that I am not talking about adding any extension at the abstract level - just supporting what is allowed by WSDL 1.1) > > Ugo > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:00 PM > > To: Ugo Corda; Francisco Curbera > > Cc: Ron Ten-Hove; Satish Thatte; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org; > > ygoland@bea.com > > Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation > > definitions > > > > > > "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> writes: > > > > > > Just curious: does WSIF allow you to define abstract > > messages that are not > > part of an abstract operation? > > > > > > Ugo > > > > No it doesn't; WSIF only adds additional bindings to WSDL, > > not anything > > at the abstract level. > > > > Sanjiva. > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]