[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue # 62 Proposal to Vote
I suggest to add the following wording that clarifies the usage of serializable scopes in the presence of event handlers: If a serializable scope has an event handler associated with it, no enclosed scope nor a scope in the body of the event handler can be serializable. If a non-serializable scope has an event handler associated with it, an enclosed scope as well as a scope in the body of the event handler can be serializable. I hope that's the English equivalent of the following: Let's assume a scope S, an event handler E associated with S, a scope S-S that is part of S, and a scope S-E that is part of E. Then the following rules apply 1. If S is marked variableAccessSerializable="yes", then neither scope S-S nor scope S-E can be marked with variableAccessSerializable ="yes". 2. If scope S-S is marked variableAccessSerializable="yes", scope S-E can also be marked variableAccessSerializable="yes" Cheers, dieter
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]